2010/7/29 clarinetcola :
> Awesome! I didn't think of starting and stopping simply because the
> existing music were there in two staves already and I didn't want to
> mess up the format. I've just got some copy and pasting to do now.
Hi!
Why not "simply" use nested music expressions?
Like thi
Awesome! I didn't think of starting and stopping simply because the existing
music were there in two staves already and I didn't want to mess up the
format. I've just got some copy and pasting to do now.
cheers!
cc
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Positio
oh sorry, I hadn't got it !
Here's my proposal. I let you solve the pb of clefs and time signature
positionning at the beginning of the two voices (I don't know how to do
it...). I have created 3 staves : up and down are the two staves in the
middle, and middle is the signle stave. Playing wit
-between-two-ending-staffs-tp29292900p29293564.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
hi !
You can just open << at the place where you want your staff to be
divided into two parts, and indicate \new Staff for the second staff.
Then close the >> to come back to single staff. (taken from LSR :
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=110)
\version "2.13.17"
\score {
<<
\new Staff
?
No idea %-|
Cheers
Clarinetcola
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Position-Staff-between-two-ending-staffs-tp29292900p29292900.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user ma
