users mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
^^^^^^^^^
>> Subject: Re: PhrasingSlur and \slurUp
>> X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
>> List-Id: Lilypond user discussion
>> List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/lilypond-user
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, [ISO-8859-15] Jérémie Lumbroso wrote:
>
> AAJ> May I suggest that either a seperate command (phrasingslurUp) is defined
>
> Those commands already exist: \phrasingSlurUp, \phrasingSlurDown and
> \phrasingSlurBoth.
Must have been added since 1.5.63 then, forget I asked ;-)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> AAJ> May I suggest that either a seperate command (phrasingslurUp) is defined
>
> Those commands already exist: \phrasingSlurUp, \phrasingSlurDown and
> \phrasingSlurBoth.
they were added very recently to the 1.5 series. Perhaps AAJ isn't
running that one yet.
--
AAJ> May I suggest that either a seperate command (phrasingslurUp) is defined
Those commands already exist: \phrasingSlurUp, \phrasingSlurDown and
\phrasingSlurBoth.
--
Best regards,
Jérémiemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Hi
May I suggest that either a seperate command (phrasingslurUp) is defined
or preferrably it's put under the control of \slurUp, although I donno how
to do that, though; have one command "execute" two scheme-calls.
And of course I suggest parallel changes to \slurDown and \slurBoth.
If nobody
