Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-21 Thread Mats Bengtsson
One workaround is to use the following setting, \override Staff.SustainPedalLineSpanner #'staff-padding = #5 and adjust the number 5 to be large enough that all pedal marks are as low as the lowest one in the score but not too large so that the pedal marks end up being too low. The value

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-21 Thread stefankaegi
Sorry, that I write again, but it's very urgent. Maybe it wasn't clear what I meant. There is an example image in the mail. As you see the pedal isn't always at the same height. How could I fix that? Thank you for your answers Best wishes Stefan Am Sonntag, den 13.12.2009, 14:06 + schrieb Ne

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-13 Thread stefankaegi
I did it like this. It looks better now. Do you have any idea how I could fix the position of the pedal? Now it is located at various heights. Thank you Stefan Am Sonntag, den 13.12.2009, 14:06 + schrieb Neil Puttock: > 2009/12/12 James Bailey : > > > This means this: > > \new Staff = "LH" <

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-13 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/12/12 James Bailey : > This means this: > \new Staff = "LH" << \LH \pedal >> This will only work if the skips in \pedal coincide with notes in \LH, otherwise the brackets will still be misaligned. Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lil

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-12 Thread James Bailey
On 12.12.2009, at 00:29, Neil Puttock wrote: 2009/12/11 stefankaegi : uhm... I have some doubts you understand me properly... The pedalling actually should be like in my example (pedal on "e" and "f"), but it's a bit bad positioned. This is a nasty bug of the Dynamics context: the pedal b

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-12 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Stefan, Hm... I tried this a bit... Isn't a good solution either as it seems, since I often have pedal where there are no notes. (Already tried this polyphony thing: << { } \\ { } \\ >> ; but this doesn't actually work fine) It probably does if you use << {} \new Voice {} >> instead. D

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-12 Thread stefankaegi
Hm... I tried this a bit... Isn't a good solution either as it seems, since I often have pedal where there are no notes. (Already tried this polyphony thing: << { } \\ { } \\ >> ; but this doesn't actually work fine) Do you have any idea how I could change the pedal behaviour at certain points in

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-11 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/12/11 stefankaegi : > uhm... I have some doubts you understand me properly... The pedalling > actually should be like in my example (pedal on "e" and "f"), but it's a > bit bad positioned. This is a nasty bug of the Dynamics context: the pedal bounds aren't attached to the noteheads. In your

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-11 Thread stefankaegi
uhm... I have some doubts you understand me properly... The pedalling actually should be like in my example (pedal on "e" and "f"), but it's a bit bad positioned. Hope, this makes it clear. Thank you, best wishes Stefan Am Freitag, den 11.12.2009, 21:02 +0100 schrieb Robin Bannister: > Stefan Ka

Re: Pedal at wrong position

2009-12-11 Thread Robin Bannister
Stefan Kaegi wrote: It actually should be under the f (in the left hand) and not before. Then you shouldn't say \sustainOn until the cadenza has been and gone, i.e. s1\sustainOn is all you need - because the s1 starts when the f starts. See the bracket example in NR 2.2.2 - meas