Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> To LilyPond, braces indicate sequential music.
>
> Well, clearly there’s more going on than simply “sequential music”, or else
>
> \transpose c c’ { c d }
>
> would be no different than
>
> \transpose c c’ { c } d
>
> which clearly isn’t true.
It
Hi David,
> To LilyPond, braces indicate sequential music.
Well, clearly there’s more going on than simply “sequential music”, or else
\transpose c c’ { c d }
would be no different than
\transpose c c’ { c } d
which clearly isn’t true.
> Of course it sees the subsequent braces and ac
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> { ^.^> } is equivalent to \sequential { ^.^> } which neither makes sense nor
>> works.
>
> Well, as a function,
>
>\parenthesize { ^.^> }
>
> makes total sense to me,
That's your privilege. To LilyPond, braces indicate sequential music.
> So are y
Hi David,
> { ^.^> } is equivalent to \sequential { ^.^> } which neither makes sense nor
> works.
Well, as a function,
\parenthesize { ^.^> }
makes total sense to me, and is quite different from
\parenthesize ^. ^>
So are you saying that there’s some technical reason
-\tweak parenth
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David (et al.),
>
>> { 4-\tweak parenthesize #'a ^.-\tweak parenthesize #'a ^> }
>>
>> I'm not saying that this is supposed to be the last word on the
>> interface but it would produce the data I've been thinking of.
>
> This syntax has more flexibility than the mor
Hi David (et al.),
> { 4-\tweak parenthesize #'a ^.-\tweak parenthesize #'a ^> }
>
> I'm not saying that this is supposed to be the last word on the
> interface but it would produce the data I've been thinking of.
This syntax has more flexibility than the more obvious/intuitive
4-\tweak par
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 01.02.2016 11:38, David Kastrup wrote:
>> The "parenthesize" property is a boolean. Maybe it should be a
>> boolean-or-symbol ? And if it's a symbol, the respective engraver
>> collects all articulations with the same symbol and then sets one set of
>> parentheses ar
On 01.02.2016 11:38, David Kastrup wrote:
The "parenthesize" property is a boolean. Maybe it should be a
boolean-or-symbol ? And if it's a symbol, the respective engraver
collects all articulations with the same symbol and then sets one set of
parentheses around all of them?
I can’t quite fig
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Thanks Simon. Perfect. I also sometimes have trouble coming up with
> names for these things!
The "parenthesize" property is a boolean. Maybe it should be a
boolean-or-symbol ? And if it's a symbol, the respective engraver
collects all articulations with the same symbo
Thanks Simon. Perfect. I also sometimes have trouble coming up with
names for these things!
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 31.01.2016 15:02, Simon Albrecht wrote:
shortAccentWithParens = -\tweak stencil #ly:text-interface::print
-\tweak text \markup {
Actually, each of the dashes before \tweak may be omitted.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https
On 31.01.2016 14:48, Andrew Bernard wrote:
If I have an accent and a staccato indication together on a note and I
want a single set of parentheses around both, how can this be
achieved? Is this possible?
How about that? Couldn’t think of a less clumsy name.
%%
\version "2.19.35"
sho
If I have an accent and a staccato indication together on a note and I want a
single set of parentheses around both, how can this be achieved? Is this
possible?
Andrew
— snip
% This does not achieve it.
\version "2.19.35"
{
c''^. -\parenthesize ^>
}
— snip
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
