Re: Parenthesised arpeggio collision

2010-11-21 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Neil Puttock" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "Valentin Villenave" ; "LilyPond User Group" Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:19 PM Subject: Re: Parenthesised arpeggio collision On 20 November 2010 13:07, Phil

Re: Parenthesised arpeggio collision

2010-11-20 Thread Neil Puttock
On 20 November 2010 13:07, Phil Holmes wrote: > Looking at this prior to raising a bug report.  I'd be interested in finding > out the actual widths of the arpeggio grobs.  Is there a way of printing > these out somehow? \override Arpeggio #'after-line-breaking = #(lambda (grob) (newline) (

Re: Parenthesised arpeggio collision

2010-11-20 Thread Phil Holmes
Cc: "LilyPond User Group" Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 5:14 PM Subject: Re: Parenthesised arpeggio collision On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: I can't find this on the tracker - is it a known bug? Using parenthesised arpeggios with 2 (or more) staves, the arpeggio

Re: Parenthesised arpeggio collision

2010-11-19 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > I can't find this on the tracker - is it a known bug?  Using parenthesised > arpeggios with 2 (or more) staves, the arpeggio gets too close to the bar > line when the note values in the other stave are less than full bar. Doesn't > happen with

Parenthesised arpeggio collision

2010-11-19 Thread Phil Holmes
I can't find this on the tracker - is it a known bug? Using parenthesised arpeggios with 2 (or more) staves, the arpeggio gets too close to the bar line when the note values in the other stave are less than full bar. Doesn't happen with standard arpeggios. -- Phil Holmes <>__