Ralph Palmer wrote Saturday, September 05, 2009 4:06 PM
I haven't had much time to do much Lilypond work on my new-ish
Ubuntu setup.
I'd like some advice on where to put a generic "definitions.ly"
file that I
want to include in most of my pieces. I'm afraid that if I put the
definitions.ly in
2009/9/5 Nick Payne :
> \include "../../../definitions.ly"
A slight problem is: this makes your file less relocatable and
dependant on the depth of the directory tree which it is in.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
www.csmbadajoz.com
: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Ralph Palmer
Sent: Sunday, 6 September 2009 1:07 AM
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: PATH and definitions.ly problem
Hi -
I feel kind of fo
On 05.09.2009, at 17:06, Ralph Palmer wrote:
Hi -
I feel kind of foolish, but . . . .
I haven't had much time to do much Lilypond work on my new-ish
Ubuntu setup. I'd like some advice on where to put a generic
"definitions.ly" file that I want to include in most of my pieces.
I'm afraid
2009/9/5 Ralph Palmer :
> Hi -
>
> I feel kind of foolish, but . . . .
>
> I haven't had much time to do much Lilypond work on my new-ish Ubuntu setup.
> I'd like some advice on where to put a generic "definitions.ly" file that I
> want to include in most of my pieces. I'm afraid that if I put the
Hi -
I feel kind of foolish, but . . . .
I haven't had much time to do much Lilypond work on my new-ish Ubuntu setup.
I'd like some advice on where to put a generic "definitions.ly" file that I
want to include in most of my pieces. I'm afraid that if I put the
definitions.ly in my Lilypond progra
