Re: Octavation of clef works with lilypond v 2.16.1, but not with 2.18

2015-01-28 9:24 GMT+01:00 Martin Dümig : > Hello, > > i have the problem that my lilypond files do not produce octavated clefs > with version 2.18 and 2.19. I made a small program which generates the > expected output with 2.16, but not with 2.18 and up. Here i get the warning > > Warnung: Eigens

Octavation of clef works with lilypond v 2.16.1, but not with 2.18

Hello, i have the problem that my lilypond files do not produce octavated clefs with version 2.18 and 2.19. I made a small program which generates the expected output with 2.16, but not with 2.18 and up. Here i get the warning Warnung: Eigenschafts-Typprüfung für »clefOctavation« (translation

Re: strange octavation behaviour

hi phil, harm,On 22 Aug 2013, at 15:40, Phil Holmes wrote:The brackets end in the correct place, according to Elaine Gould - they should end after the "notehead".  The collision with the arpeggio is a bug.i didn't have my copy of gould to hand when i wrote the mail and had the "wrong" definition in

Re: strange octavation behaviour

Subject: strange octavation behaviour hi, consider the following snippet: \version "2.17.20" \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'''' { \ottava #1 4.\arpeggio b8 a4 f \ottava #0 | R1 \ottava #1 4.\arpeggio b8 a4 f

Re: strange octavation behaviour

compiled, it produces the output in the attached PNG. > > the first bar is the correct notation (i.e. the ottava bracket should stop > before the rest), but the ottava bracket is pushed into the arpeggio and ends > directly after the half note. in the third bar, the ottava bracket starts

strange octavation behaviour

ottava bracket is pushed into the arpeggio and ends directly after the half note. in the third bar, the ottava bracket starts in the correct place, but is somewhat too long. (actually i think it's too short -- shouldn't the octavation spanner go as far as the note/rest _sounds_?).setting m

Re: Octavation

n LilyPond format. > > It runs a two-pass procedure (I'm giving a simplified picture): > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Octavation-tp5038198p27400063.html > Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.

Re: Octavation

giving a simplified picture): > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Octavation-tp5038198p27400063.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gn

Re: Treble clef with optional octavation?

Alexander Kobel schrieb: Hi, all, anyone knows how to write a G clef, like in \clef "treble_8" but with the octavation "8" in parentheses? (It's for a staff with a solo voice sung by either alto or baritone, and thus the octavation is optional.) This solution (w

Treble clef with optional octavation?

Hi, all, anyone knows how to write a G clef, like in \clef "treble_8" but with the octavation "8" in parentheses? (It's for a staff with a solo voice sung by either alto or baritone, and thus the octavation is option

Re: Octavation in lilypond

2008/7/14 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dear Han-Wen > > Could you tell me how I could include an octavation mark in a score. > (I have searched the net but have not come up with something that > works.) > > Specifically, I would like to add the 8va note on the

Fwd: Octavation in lilypond

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ebrahim Mayat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:52 PM Subject: Octavation in lilypond To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Han-Wen Could you tell me how I could include an octavation mark in a score. (I have searched the net but have no

Re: LSR octavation function

Nice job, Jay! Thanks! Jon Valentin Villenave wrote: 2008/5/31 Jay Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Ugh! I'm learning. Here's a quick fix that seems to work: ... And you're learning faster than me! :-) The LSR snippet has now been updated. Cheers, Valentin _

Re: LSR octavation function

2008/5/31 Jay Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ugh! I'm learning. Here's a quick fix that seems to work: ... And you're learning faster than me! :-) The LSR snippet has now been updated. Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@g

Re: LSR octavation function

wow, thanks for the quick fix. now it works perfect for me. Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sat, 31 May 2008 06:23:37 + (UTC) > Von: Jay Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Betreff: Re: LSR octavation function > Tao Cumplido gmx

Re: LSR octavation function

Tao Cumplido gmx.net> writes: > i.e. \octaves { \times 2/3 { c'4 c' c' } } > results in a crash. Ugh! I'm learning. Here's a quick fix that seems to work: #(define (octave-up m t) (let* ((octave (1- t)) (new-note (ly:music-deep-copy m)) (new-pitch (ly:make-pitch octave

LSR octavation function

Hi, the function of the following snippet crashes when using the \times command. i.e. \octaves { \times 2/3 { c'4 c' c' } } results in a crash. it would be nice to have this fixed if possible since it's really a useful function. thanks. http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=445 -- Super-Akti

Re: chord fingerings and octavation

Michael Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 04:07:06PM +: > You can fix both of these with staff-padding; see the section on "Moving > Objects" in the manual. ... > \override Voice.TextScript #'staff-padding = #4 Yes, that's exactly how i wanted it to be. Thank you very

Re: chord fingerings and octavation

Daniel Leidisch leidisch.net> writes: > > > 1. As you can see, the chord fingerings are crossing the octavation > bracket. What could I do about that? > > 2. Is it possible to have the fingerings at the same height? It looks > a bit jagged to me, I would prefer all the

Re: chord fingerings and octavation

a guitar chord such as an open E on > a single treble clef (since the voicing spans two octaves) > and NOT have ledger lines. At least from the perspective > of my limited scoring experience. Well, I used octavation in order to avoid much ledger lines. Unfortunately, the chord fingerings,

RE: chord fingerings and octavation

erience.If I am wrong I'd appreciate being corrected. :-) > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:31:46 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL > PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: chord fingerings and octavation> > Sorry, I forgot > to expand the tabs:> > > \version &quo

Re: chord fingerings and octavation

Sorry, I forgot to expand the tabs: \version "2.10.0" << \chords { g2:7 c g:7 c g:7 c:maj7 g:7.9.13 c:6.9 } \relative c'' { #(set-octavation 1) 2^\markup \fret-diagram-terse #"x;x;5;7;6;7;" ^\markup \fret-diagram-terse #"x;x;5-(;5;5-)

chord fingerings and octavation

7 g:7.9.13 c:6.9 } \relative c'' { #(set-octavation 1) 2^\markup \fret-diagram-terse #"x;x;5;7;6;7;" ^\markup \fret-diagram-terse #"x;x;5-(;5;5-);8;"

Re: set-octavation bug?

Orm Finnendahl wrote: \version "2.11.7" \relative c'''' { #(set-octavation 1) b4~ #(set-octavation 2) b4~ #(set-octavation 1) b4~ #(set-octavation 0) b4 } Wow, that's weird. Entered as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=236 BTW, bug r

set-octavation bug?

Hi, something seems completely wrong here: \version "2.11.7" \relative c'''' { #(set-octavation 1) b4~ #(set-octavation 2) b4~ #(set-octavation 1) b4~ #(set-octavation 0) b4 } all pitches should be the same (and lilypond obviously thinks so as it prints the slu

Re: Octavation

Kirill schreef: So I handle many spanning objects this way (quite uniformly and extensibly). Now suddenly I realised that the ottava line should be handled differently. If I merely use (#set-octavation ...) for the start and end of the line, I will also need to transpose the notes (as Sibelius

Re: Octavation

I use \relative, so \transpose doesn't work. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Octavation

d to a note, that is why in Pass 2 I scan through all the lines and find a note on which this line should terminate (because in LilyPond it should start and end on a note, right?). So I handle many spanning objects this way (quite uniformly and extensibly). Now suddenly I realised that the ottava line

Re: Octavation

in LilyPond it should start and end on a note, right?). So I handle many spanning objects this way (quite uniformly and extensibly). Now suddenly I realised that the ottava line should be handled differently. If I merely use (#set-octavation ...) for the start and end of the line, I will also

Re: Octavation

> > > >What parameters do I have to set for a text spanner so as to *exactly* > >emulate > >the apperance of a regular ottava line? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >___ > >lilypond-user mailing list > >lilypond-user gnu.org > >http://lists.gnu.

Re: Octavation

To find out the answer yourself, go to the section on Ottava brackets in the on-line manual and follow the link at the bottom of the page to the program reference for the OttavaBracket object. There, you will find the values of the properties that are set by default. Then you can do the same for T

Re: Octavation

Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes: > > How about using a text spanner? > >/Mats > What parameters do I have to set for a text spanner so as to *exactly* emulate the apperance of a regular ottava line? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypo

Re: Octavation

How about using a text spanner? /Mats Quoting Kirill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, list. Is there a way to draw the octavation line (ottava alta/bassa) without actually transposing the pitches by an octave? ___ lilypond-user mailin

Octavation

Hello, list. Is there a way to draw the octavation line (ottava alta/bassa) without actually transposing the pitches by an octave? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

octavation at line breaks

Hi, version 2.8.2 (How) is it possible to move the octavation line only AFTER line breaks? Sometimes there are in the following line fingerings and so on, which I want to have inside the octavation line, and moving the octavation line BEFORE the line break lets view the octavation line too high

Re: 2.9.2 octavation dashes not cancelled and more but not in 2.8.1-4

Graham Percival wrote: On 25-Apr-06, at 6:36 PM, Paul Scott wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Just the addition of #(set-octavation 1) causes the rest of the staff lines to be dashed. (commenting that line restores the solid staff lines.) Example later if necessary. I'm trying to get some

Re: 2.9.2 octavation dashes not cancelled and more but not in 2.8.1-4

On 25-Apr-06, at 6:36 PM, Paul Scott wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Just the addition of #(set-octavation 1) causes the rest of the staff lines to be dashed. (commenting that line restores the solid staff lines.) Example later if necessary. I'm trying to get some parts out right away.

Re: 2.9.2 octavation dashes not cancelled and more but not in 2.8.1-4

Paul Scott wrote: Just the addition of #(set-octavation 1) causes the rest of the staff lines to be dashed. (commenting that line restores the solid staff lines.) Example later if necessary. I'm trying to get some parts out right away. This problem goes away with 2.8.1-4 as well

2.9.2 octavation dashes not cancelled

Just the addition of #(set-octavation 1) causes the rest of the staff lines to be dashed. (commenting that line restores the solid staff lines.) Example later if necessary. I'm trying to get some parts out right away. Paul Scott ___ lil

Re: Octavation line

Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Try > \property Score.OttavaSpanner \override #'padding = #2 I moved this into . Feri. ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listin

Re: Octavation line

; Hi again. > > > > I am using the octavation line (I hope this is the correct way to write > > it) and it works. The only problem is that it is a little glues to slurs > > and numbers. Is there any type of control of the distance between that > &

Re: Octavation line

Try \property Score.OttavaSpanner \override #'padding = #2 (the unit for all lengths is the spacing between two lines in the stave). /Mats Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes wrote: Hi again. I am using the octavation line (I hope this is the correct way to write it) and it works. The only pr

Octavation line

Hi again. I am using the octavation line (I hope this is the correct way to write it) and it works. The only problem is that it is a little glues to slurs and numbers. Is there any type of control of the distance between that line and the stave? Thanks for the help. Alberto