Thanks Anthony. I have solved the problem by separating the voices and
using two "relative" commands based on different octaves. Thus the notes
are all right now.
Having said that, your recommendation seems very interesting and I'll
save it for another document Im working on.
--
Jesús Guillermo A
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jesús Guillermo Andrade
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Thanks Joseph for your prompt reply! I tried your suggestion but,
>instead of fixing the notes, they went way off even further down.
>After many tries, i found a solution: each sequence must be preceded by
>a \relat
Thank you Andrew! It seems your suggestion works Ok. You're quite right
in ascertain how difficult can be at first to understand relative mode
correctly. I *believe* I do now, but as they say, one never knows until
one does!
Anyway, I'm going to separate the voices in each staff so i can be
simpler
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 03:36 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all! This is my first post and I really can't understand what is
> it I am doing wrong. This file shows that I what to repeat a cord and a
> separate note in the same staff several times. However, the notes seem
> to be interprete
Thanks Joseph for your prompt reply! I tried your suggestion but,
instead of fixing the notes, they went way off even further down.
After many tries, i found a solution: each sequence must be preceded by
a \relative fa, so the position restarts.
Is there any other way to do this?
>> fragA = <<
On 03/04/07, Jesús Guillermo Andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all! This is my first post and I really can't understand what is
it I am doing wrong. This file shows that I what to repeat a cord and a
separate note in the same staff several times. However, the notes seem
to be interpreted a
Hello all! This is my first post and I really can't understand what is
it I am doing wrong. This file shows that I what to repeat a cord and a
separate note in the same staff several times. However, the notes seem
to be interpreted as relative in the sense that they are always going
one octave lowe