Joerg Anders writes:
> Unfortunately, it does not create a wavy line. But I'll leave all untouched.
> If somebody has any suggestions let me know.
This seems to have dropped from the documentation when 'type was
renamed to 'style.
Try:
\relative c' { c1
\property Voice.TextSpanner \s
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Erik Sandberg wrote:
>
> I took your code, added \score {\notes{ }} around it, and ran "convert-ly -f
> 1.6" on it :). Here's the result, which works:
>
> \score {
> \notes {
> g #(ly:export (make-span-event 'TextSpanEvent START)) g #(ly:export
> (make-span-event 'TextSpa
On Monday 12 January 2004 12.42, Joerg Anders wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > What you want is probably
> > flat = \markup { \raise #0.2 \smaller \musicglyph #"accidentals--2" }
>
> Thank you!
>
> Last question: What happend with the wavy lines:
>
> g \spanrequest \start "te
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Erik Sandberg wrote:
>
> What you want is probably
> flat = \markup { \raise #0.2 \smaller \musicglyph #"accidentals--2" }
>
Thank you!
Last question: What happend with the wavy lines:
g \spanrequest \start "text" g \spanrequest \stop "text"
in LilyPond-1.x ?
--
J.An
On Monday 12 January 2004 10.13, Joerg Anders wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-15] José Luis Cruz wrote:
> > I reccomend you take a look at the tutorial avaliable at:
>
> I tried it but to tell the truth: I'm despaired:
>
> I tried to convert the LilyPond 1.x definition for flat
> symbol in t
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Aaron wrote:
> Just a small question why is scheme stuff used for making accidentals?
> I thought that a note c would become cis for a sharp and ces for a flat
> or a double sharp cisis etc.
I want to make chord annotations C#7
Ok, I know there is a LilyPond inherent chord
HI,
Just a small question why is scheme stuff used for making accidentals?
I thought that a note c would become cis for a sharp and ces for a flat
or a double sharp cisis etc.
Aaron
Joerg Anders wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-15] José Luis Cruz wrote:
I reccomend you take a look at t
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-15] José Luis Cruz wrote:
> I reccomend you take a look at the tutorial avaliable at:
>
I tried it but to tell the truth: I'm despaired:
I tried to convert the LilyPond 1.x definition for flat
symbol in texts:
#(define flat '((raise . 0.2) (font-relative-size . -1
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Erik Sandberg wrote:
>
> Note that this is just what I have found out from my own experience using
Thank you. If think I'll decide for < c e g > for "normal" chords and
<< ... >> only for StaffGroup, PianoScore ... a.s.o.
--
J.Anders, Chemnitz, GERMANY ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 19.51, Joerg Anders wrote:
> Thank you. But I thought chords remain < d2 a2 >
> Only StaffGroup and ChoirStaff have <<...>> parenthesis.(?)
>
> The problem is:
>
> g'4 < e' b' f' > a a
>
> is different from
>
> g'4 << e' b' f' >> a a
>
> the 2 'a' are one octave higher. T
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-15] José Luis Cruz wrote:
> It's very very short, and explains very well the syntax. But, here i
> tell you the basics. The new syntax is:
>
Thank you very much! Is implemented in noteedit-2.3.5pre3.tgz , see
http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/note_pre/no
Thanks, it is much clearer this way.
And I don't redo the tutorial every time a version of lilypond comes out.
If I have a question I usually go for the unified index.
This would make a good pdf card to be added as a link on the main docs page.
Aaron
___
Hi guys,
well, i will try to bring some light..
I reccomend you take a look at the tutorial avaliable at:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Tutorial.html
It's very very short, and explains very well the syntax. But, here i
tell you the basics. The new syntax is:
I reffered to two simultaneous notes <>
I don't use chords so I bow to the list for their input.
Aaron
Thank you. But I thought chords remain < d2 a2 >
Only StaffGroup and ChoirStaff have <<...>> parenthesis.(?)
The problem is:
g'4 < e' b' f' > a a
is different from
g'4 << e' b' f'
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Aaron wrote:
> yes I need them:
>
> slurs:
> a4 \(b c c |
>
> d a b a \) |
>
> two notes together:
> <>
>
>
Thank you. But I thought chords remain < d2 a2 >
Only StaffGroup and ChoirStaff have <<...>> parenthesis.(?)
The problem is:
g'4 < e' b' f' > a a
is different f
Joerg Anders wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-15] José Luis Cruz wrote:
So i really don't know it has changed anything respect from previous
versions. I attach the lilypond conversion of example9.not, if someone
is intereseted could take a look at it.
Ok, I've changed it again. Try no
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-15] José Luis Cruz wrote:
>
> So i really don't know it has changed anything respect from previous
> versions. I attach the lilypond conversion of example9.not, if someone
> is intereseted could take a look at it.
Ok, I've changed it again. Try noteedit-2.3.5pre2.tg
17 matches
Mail list logo
