Re: Note whiteout

2015-03-27 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 27.03.2015 um 05:28 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Well, answering my own question here. The following works, but now I feel the need to ask is the best way to do this sort of operation? Yes, I think so. Why wouldn’t layer = 3 or = 2 suffice for LedgerLineSpanner also? Yours, Simon \version "2.1

Re: Note whiteout

2015-03-26 Thread Andrew Bernard
Well, answering my own question here. The following works, but now I feel the need to ask is the best way to do this sort of operation? \version "2.19.17" treble = \relative c'' {   \override Stem.layer = #3   e'   \change Staff = "bass"   \override NoteHead.layer = #3   -\markup {     \with-

Re: Note whiteout

2015-03-26 Thread Andrew Bernard
I now understand this can be done using a filled-box markup in white. But how do you get the box under the notehead and leger lines but above the ties? I am aware of layer order, but I can’t get the whiteout box just where it should be in the z-order. Andrew On 27 March 2015 at 12:05:33, And

Note whiteout

2015-03-26 Thread Andrew Bernard
What do I whiteout and how exactly to get the chord in the example covering the leger lines to nicely whiteout just the right things? Notehead, leger lines, stem? Not real music, just the smallest example I could make. \version "2.19.17" treble = \relative c'' {   e   \change Staff = "bass"