On 11/7/16 5:03 AM, "mclaren" wrote:
>
>The Lilypond documentation is poorly organized and extremely incomplete.
>For
>exmaple, I was only only able to find out about tie direction control by
>glancing at an unrelated list of tweaks. Tie direction control \tieUp and
>\tieDown should be featured
On 07.11.2016 12:03, mclaren wrote:
This offers an example of the inadequacy of the Lilypond documentation. This
kind of limitation in Lilypond's output really should be featured
prominently somewhere in the basic info about entering note-values in the
Lilypond Learning Guide. One sentence would
mclaren writes:
> Thanks, it's useful to know that Lilypond doesn't have printable
> objects to represent time values shorter than 1/128 note, but that
> Lilypond nevertheless does insert them into scores and deal with them.
>
> This offers an example of the inadequacy of the Lilypond
> documenta
Il giorno lun 7 nov 2016 alle 12:03, mclaren
ha scritto:
The Lilypond documentation is poorly organized and extremely
incomplete. For
exmaple, I was only only able to find out about tie direction control
by
glancing at an unrelated list of tweaks. Tie direction control \tieUp
and
\tieDown shou
Am 07.11.2016 um 12:03 schrieb mclaren:
> The Lilypond documentation is poorly organized and extremely incomplete. For
> exmaple, I was only only able to find out about tie direction control by
> glancing at an unrelated list of tweaks. Tie direction control \tieUp and
> \tieDown should be featur
Am 07.11.2016 um 12:03 schrieb mclaren:
> The Lilypond documentation is poorly organized and extremely incomplete. For
> exmaple, I was only only able to find out about tie direction control by
> glancing at an unrelated list of tweaks. Tie direction control \tieUp and
> \tieDown should be featured
ection control \tieUp and
\tieDown should be featured prominently in the Lilypond Learning Manual in
the section on ties.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Mystery-empty-staves-appear-on-score-tp196198p196264.html
Sent from the User mailing l
On 07.11.2016 11:29, Urs Liska wrote:
Experience shows that
Lilypond won't print a rest shorter than 1/128 note, so maybe if I enter a
short enough silent rest Lilypond won't insert it at all in the score.
LilyPond doesn't know about notes or rests shorter than 1/128. This is
an arbitrary limita
Am 07.11.2016 um 11:23 schrieb mclaren:
> Thanks! That answer a lot of questions. So presumably the S2 is means
> "silent half note rest."
> I'm guessing, then, that S1024 or S4096 will generate silent 1/1024 note
> rest and silent 1/4096 note rests, respectively.
>
> Ideally, what I want is a s
e. I'll fiddle around with
Lilypond some more and see what I can come up with. In any case, this
valuable clue points me in the right direction.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Mystery-empty-staves-appear-on-score-tp196198p196258.html
Sent from the
Hi mclaren,
I would not know how to play these nested tuplets and I would have
difficulties with that piece. But that's not the question.
The empty staves are there, because you ask for them with your \breaks
variable. Wherever you put \breaks into the music (at least 3 times in
your score), you
}
\breaks
\tuplet 18/15
{
c4[ \tuplet 7/3 {b4 \tuplet 6/3 {a4 \tuplet 5/3 {g4 \tuplet 4/3 {f4 \tuplet
3/4 {e4 \tuplet 3/5 {f4 \tuplet 3/6 {g4 \tuplet 3/7 {f d4]
c4[ \tuplet 7/3 {b4 \tuplet 6/3 {a4 \tuplet 5/3 {g4 \tuplet 4/3 {f4 \tuplet
3/4 {e4 \tuplet 3/5 {f4 \tuplet 3/6 {g4 \tuplet 3/7 {f }}}} d4]
12 matches
Mail list logo
