Re: [Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-28 Thread Luis G.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 27-12-2004 a las 23:41, Graham Percival escribi=F3: > > Just BRILLIANT! It's almost perfect! It still doesn't reach the > > rightmost margin, but I think it "catches the eye" :-)=3D20 > > Until I get perfection (hehe), this approach is definitely

Re: [Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-27 Thread Graham Percival
On 27-Dec-04, at 9:11 PM, Luis G. López wrote: Ok, then add r8*1/2 or r8*1/4 Just BRILLIANT! It's almost perfect! It still doesn't reach the rightmost margin, but I think it "catches the eye" :-)=20 Until I get perfection (hehe), this approach is definitely a winner! If you still want it longer, th

Re: [Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-27 Thread Luis G.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 27-12-2004 a las 21:44, Graham Percival escribi=F3: > > H I already tried that, but I get a "double beam". I mean, I=20 > > get > > the beam, but below a little "-". I stared at it a long time until I > > realize that that "-" is the beam

Re: [Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-27 Thread Graham Percival
On 27-Dec-04, at 8:17 PM, Luis G. López wrote: Add an r16 or r32 or something like that. H I already tried that, but I get a "double beam". I mean, I get the beam, but below a little "-". I stared at it a long time until I realize that that "-" is the beam of a 1/16th note :-) Ok, then add

Re: [Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-27 Thread Luis G.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 27-12-2004 a las 16:08, Graham Percival escribi=F3: > On 27-Dec-04, at 1:14 PM, Luis G. L=F3pez wrote: > > The problem is that the beam doesn't go "further" enough. Please chec= k > > this: > > > > \version "2.4.2" > > \paper{ raggedright =3D ##t

Re: [Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-27 Thread Graham Percival
On 27-Dec-04, at 1:14 PM, Luis G. López wrote: The problem is that the beam doesn't go "further" enough. Please check this: \version "2.4.2" \paper{ raggedright = ##t } \score { \context Staff \relative c'' { \key c \major << \override Rest #'transparent = ##t { c8[ r d r

Re: [Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-27 Thread Luis G.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi!!! :-) > please ALWAYS say, which version You mean, so that it is not necessary > for the helping person to remember or to look up older E-Mails. Ouch! I think I still have a lot of things to learn :-) Your solution solves great one of the problems (the notes

Re: [Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-27 Thread Roland Goretzki
Hello list, hello Luis, please ALWAYS say, which version You mean, so that it is not necessary for the helping person to remember or to look up older E-Mails. My propose will be for the 2.2.x, and You might update it for 2.4.x: You wrote: > I have no rests in that staff; I would need something l

[Fwd: Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )]

2004-12-27 Thread Luis G.
Again I forgot to send to the list... I apologize :-) --- Begin Message --- Hi!!! :-) Thank you very much for your advices; I will follow them! :-) El dom, 26-12-2004 a las 23:44, Graham Percival escribió: > On 24-Dec-04, at 11:53 AM, Luis G. López wrote: > > To make the beams "go further" I'm us

Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )

2004-12-26 Thread Graham Percival
On 24-Dec-04, at 11:53 AM, Luis G. López wrote: To make the beams "go further" I'm using a hidden note; but: 1) It is heard in the midi file, and if I replace it with a rest, it doesn't get hidden. And if I use a \skip, it doesn't get beamed. I'm not certain I understand this. Why do you want to m

Re: My first serious work (and NO bug :-) )

2004-12-24 Thread Luis G.
Hi! First of all, I want to say that the "bug" I saw, was no bug at all: just my mistake (as a user kindly made me notice privately). I go on with my "piece". I think I'm on my way, but would like some advice. To make the beams "go further" I'm using a hidden note; but: 1) It is heard in the mid