Michael Lauer wrote:
I don't know what Petrucci actually used.
Obviously, he used the latest stable release of Lilypond...;)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Stefan Waler waler.at> writes:
>
> Great! Could you add petrucci-f5 at the next opportunity?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stefan
>
You can do it yourself, by putting this line in your .ly file:
#(append! supported-clefs '(("petrucci-f5" . ("clefs.petrucci.f" 4 0
I don't think the glyph is really qu
Neil Puttock wrote:
It's not documented yet, but petrucci-f3 is also available.
I should have tried :-)
It would be straightforward to add any other variants, assuming
there's no need for changes to the glyph.
Great! Could you add petrucci-f5 at the next opportunity?
Thanks,
Stefan
Hi Stefan,
2009/1/3 Stefan Waler :
> Hi,
>
> lilypond provides one petrucci style f clef (called "petrucci-f").
It's not documented yet, but petrucci-f3 is also available.
You can also use petrucci-f4, but that's identical to petrucci-f.
It would be straightforward to add any other variants, as
> "Stefan" == Stefan Waler writes:
Stefan> lilypond provides one petrucci style f clef (called
Stefan> "petrucci-f").
Stefan> Unfortunately, this is not really sufficient: similar to
Stefan> the C clefs, f clefs can be placed on various staff lines.
Here's the way I get the
> lilypond provides one petrucci style f clef (called "petrucci-f").
>
> Unfortunately, this is not really sufficient: similar to the C clefs,
> f clefs can be placed on various staff lines. Lilypond provides
> different f clefs for modern notation (bass, subbass, varbaritone) but
> not for petru
Hi,
lilypond provides one petrucci style f clef (called "petrucci-f").
Unfortunately, this is not really sufficient: similar to the C clefs, f
clefs can be placed on various staff lines. Lilypond provides different
f clefs for modern notation (bass, subbass, varbaritone) but not for
petrucci
