CTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Middle line stem direction in 2.8
> I imagine that old-school engravers had a very limited number of slur
> shapes to work with,
No. Slurs were always drawn by hand.
> so this case would make the levitating slur the only o
> I imagine that old-school engravers had a very limited number of slur
> shapes to work with,
No. Slurs were always drawn by hand.
> so this case would make the levitating slur the only option, unless
> the note-stem is inverted, in which case the slur looks very
> natural. So what did the ol
Subject: Re: Middle line stem direction in 2.8
Are you really sure that you use the same LilyPond version both in Windows
and Linux? These differences cannot possibly be platform dependent as far as
I can understand.
For the reasoning behind the change, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html
Panteleimon
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Middle line stem direction in 2.8
Are you really sure that you use the same LilyPond version both in Windows
and Linux? These differences cannot possibly be platform dependent as far as
I can understand.
For the reasoning behind the change, see
http:
Are you really sure that you use the same LilyPond version both in
Windows and Linux? These differences cannot possibly be platform
dependent as far as I can understand.
For the reasoning behind the change, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-03/msg00104.html
/Mats
Q
In the 2.7 development versions prior to the release of 2.8.0 , the stem
directions for notes on the middle line of the staff followed the direction
of neighoboring notes (a feature sponsored by Mike Rolish and Basil Crow).
It appears that in 2.8.0, this feature (which looks very nice and helps wit
