On Wed Jun 30, 2004 at 03:06:16PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I hope you have noticed the skipTypesetting property. See
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Skipping-corrected-music.html
sure, I have used it but for some reason I found the use of variables
for sect
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pedro Kroger wrote:
>
>> I forgot to mention that if you typeset long scores, it may be a good
>> idea to use variables. I use variables for each section, like
>> \sectiona \sectionb, etc. Them I can comment out the sections I don't
>> want to compile r
I hope you have noticed the skipTypesetting property. See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Skipping-corrected-music.html
/Mats
Pedro Kroger wrote:
I forgot to mention that if you typeset long scores, it may be a good
idea to use variables. I use variables for each
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Ralph Little writes:
>
> > With a lot of files related to notes files etc, I have started using
> > Makefiles to automate the build process, being a die-hard UNIX
> > programmer ;)
I did something like this. My motivation was that I didn't want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 June 2004 13:06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> If there's interest in using makefiles after all, it may be a good
> idea to revive this idea, fix the makefile, documentation and add
> lilypond-book rules etc.
That would go down pretty well w
Ralph Little writes:
> Erm, I'm not really sure what you mean.
Hmm, I'm not having my most communicative day, it seems. Some odd
years ago, I made a small effort to provide a shared make file for
lilypond, esp. for making contributions to mutopia easier.
I'm fairly sure that this was documented
11:22
To: Ralph Little
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Methods of working
Ralph Little writes:
> With a lot of files related to notes files etc, I have started using
> Makefiles to automate the build process, being a die-hard UNIX
> programmer ;)
Any big reason no
ules and the like.
As I say, does anybody else do this kind of thing?
Regards,
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 28/06/2004 11:22
To: Ralph Little
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Methods of working
Ralph Little write
Ralph Little writes:
> With a lot of files related to notes files etc, I have started using
> Makefiles to automate the build process, being a die-hard UNIX
> programmer ;)
Any big reason not to use/extend/send bug reports on the for this
purpose included .../lilypond-xyz/share/make/ly.make Makef
Hi,
With a lot of files related to notes files etc, I have started using Makefiles to
automate the build process, being a die-hard UNIX programmer ;)
If you are interested what I have, let me know and will post something.
It is not sophisticated, but means I don't have to worry about what is up-t
Thanks, all is working now. Appreciate the help.
Regards,
Chip
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Please use jEdit 4.1 -> 4.2 is not stable jet, so it is not supported, and
because of the many changes in the plugin interface, we can't support to
jEdit at one time.
Sorry,
Bert
Cannot start: java.lang.Incompat
Please use jEdit 4.1 -> 4.2 is not stable jet, so it is not supported, and
because of the many changes in the plugin interface, we can't support to
jEdit at one time.
Sorry,
Bert
> Cannot start: java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError:
> Implementing class
> Try updating to a newer version of t
Thanks for the tip. Still have an error coming up -
/usr/home/chip/.jedit/jars/LilyPondTool.jar:
Cannot start: java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Implementing class
Try updating to a newer version of the plugin
Which plugin does it want me to update? I got the latest from the sites
of all the
Sure, you must download and unzip the LilyJHelp package found on the project
website to the jars directory of jEdit. (www.sf.net/projects/lily4jedit)
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
The completion is not automatic, you should add a shortcut for
Plugins/SideKick/Show Completion Popup (Utitilities/Global
options/jEdit->Shortcuts)
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-u
--- Forwarded message follows ---
From: Thomas Scharkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bertalan Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Methods of working
Date sent: Sun, 27 Jun
> - If I want to override something I hardly know what property to set,
> I type \override and using the autocompletion and the popup
> property-help I choose the appropriate property.
This does not work for me.
Perhaps I am missing something (again)? I get no popup at all.
Thomas
cygwin on xp
I've decided to try jedit with the lilypond plugin, so I installed jedit
and the plugin, and the dozen or so plugins the lilypond plugin
requires, but am stuck on one more plugin it need - jhall.jar. I cannot
find this plugin anywhere, do you have it or know where I can find it?
Regards,
chip
B
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> A not-too-complicated 4-voice TTBB piece with lyrics usually enters at
>> about 2 hours a page for me, at the moment.
>
> The numbers that I hear surpise me much. For (admittedly: simple)
> polyphonic pieces (eg. mozart,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A not-too-complicated 4-voice TTBB piece with lyrics usually enters at
> about 2 hours a page for me, at the moment.
The numbers that I hear surpise me much. For (admittedly: simple)
polyphonic pieces (eg. mozart, gabrieli), I do about 4 to 5 pages per
hour; Usually, I
Arvid Grøtting writes:
>> It seems that not much people use Xdvi and point-and-click, not even
>> emacs users?
>
> Xdvi and what, exactly? Now you really got me curious.
In that case, go to lilypond.org and type point-and-click in the
search box.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that not much people use Xdvi and point-and-click, not even
> emacs users?
Xdvi and what, exactly? Now you really got me curious.
Me, I use GNU Emacs (under X11 on OSX) and xdvi. I use lilypond-mode
in Emacs, and I compile the files from
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Alex Young writes:
but has anyone tried Arch? I'm tempted to give it a go.
Testimonials? Acrimonials?
Then just try it, it works. You'll need to read the manual.
I'm sure it does, and I'm sure I will... I'm just not quite irritated
enough with CVS yet to take the plung
Alex Young writes:
> but has anyone tried Arch? I'm tempted to give it a go.
> Testimonials? Acrimonials?
Then just try it, it works. You'll need to read the manual.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 June 2004 14:20, Pedro Kroger wrote:
> > I do like the CVS interface--I've been wondering how to version my work
> > efficiently.
>
> Version control is another thing I don't live without. I used to use
> CVS but now I'm switching to sub
> Jan> It seems that not much people use Xdvi and
> point-and-click, not even
> Jan> emacs users?
>
> I've tried it. I think I stopped because there were problems with
> Xdvi, although I don't remember the details. The gv with refresh is
> the display I'm most comfortable with.
Perhaps
Hi.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:59:48PM +1000, Cameron and Trudy Horsburgh wrote:
> I've been wondering lately how other people organise their workflow, the
> tools used, and how they actually go through the typesetting process.
> Given the number of different platforms supported, I imagine this
> "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> It seems that not much people use Xdvi and point-and-click, not even
Jan> emacs users?
I've tried it. I think I stopped because there were problems with
Xdvi, although I don't remember the details. The gv with refresh is
* Nick Busigin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what is "ion" ?
Ion is a X window manager modeled (sort of) after screen. Here is
it's webpage:
http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/
Pedro
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Busigin writes:
> P.S. I use emacs in one window, run lilypond in a bash shell in the
> next window and gv with refresh mode set in a third.
It seems that not much people use Xdvi and point-and-click, not even
emacs users?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyP
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Alex Young wrote:
> It has struck me more than once that a windowed desktop environment
> isn't necessarily the best for lilypond work. I'm trying out an ion
> setup that has a nice, big preview pane on the left for the ps/pdf
> output, and small panes for the editor and cons
I use jEdit (www.jedit.org) with the LilyPond plugin
(www.sf.net/projects/lily4jedit). That's all. The best that I don't have to
leave jEdit and can do anything :-) If I were you I compared it to an
Emacs-based workflow :-)
- I click on the "document wizard" button and set up my staves with lyrics
I forgot to mention that if you typeset long scores, it may be a good
idea to use variables. I use variables for each section, like
\sectiona \sectionb, etc. Them I can comment out the sections I don't
want to compile right now. I also use variables for each instrument,
so I can compile only specif
* Alex Young ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> necessarily the best for lilypond work. I'm trying out an ion setup
> that has a nice, big preview pane on the left for the ps/pdf output,
> and small panes for the editor and console on the right. It looks
> and feels pretty smart, but I'm still learnin
* Cameron and Trudy Horsburgh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've been wondering lately how other people organise their workflow, the
> tools used, and how they actually go through the typesetting process.
> Given the number of different platforms supported, I imagine this would
> vary widely.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 June 2004 11:59, Cameron and Trudy Horsburgh wrote:
> I use GNU/Linux, normally with a KDE desktop. I use the kwrite editor.
> This doesn't have a lilyPond highlighting mode, but for a lot of my work
> the LaTex mode seems helpful. I'll
I've been wondering lately how other people organise their workflow, the
tools used, and how they actually go through the typesetting process.
Given the number of different platforms supported, I imagine this would
vary widely.
I use GNU/Linux, normally with a KDE desktop. I use the kwrite edit
37 matches
Mail list logo
