I’ve done some work to clean up my code and also modified the interface to be
fairly intuitive and non-intrusive. Hopefully I’ll have some time this week to
integrate this into my project, but if anyone sees anything that could be
improved, I’d love to hear about it.
✝✝
On Nov 2, 2021, at 11:26 PM, Aaron Hill wrote:
>
> Okay, would text replacement be viable as opposed to writing a bunch of
> individual functions?
That does sound nice. There would need to be some helper functions to handle
the formatting issue that Jean pointed out, but I can get that mostly
Le 03/11/2021 à 04:26, Aaron Hill a écrit :
Okay, would text replacement be viable as opposed to writing a bunch
of individual functions?
feminine =
#'(("man/woman" . "woman")
("his/her" . "her")
("he/she" . "she"))
\markup \replace \feminine {
The man/woman, tightly clutching
On 2021-11-02 2:56 pm, R. Padraic Springuel wrote:
On Nov 2, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Aaron Hill
wrote:
Not sure if this was already suggested, but could you use something
like this to concatenate arbitrary markup?
I think that what you’re suggesting is in the spirit of what David was
suggesting,
On Nov 2, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Aaron Hill wrote:
>
> Not sure if this was already suggested, but could you use something like this
> to concatenate arbitrary markup?
I think that what you’re suggesting is in the spirit of what David was
suggesting, but I’m trying to reduce the input overhead at t
Le 02/11/2021 à 16:23, R. Padraic Springuel a écrit :
On Oct 31, 2021, at 6:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
If the ugliness of juxtaposition is ok, you may use things like
\,\man
for concatenating stuff, too.
What about event functions? Can a command which does the concatenation be
written as
On 2021-11-02 8:23 am, R. Padraic Springuel wrote:
On Oct 31, 2021, at 6:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
If the ugliness of juxtaposition is ok, you may use things like
\,\man
for concatenating stuff, too.
Not sure if this was already suggested, but could you use something like
this to concate
> On Oct 31, 2021, at 6:02 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> If the ugliness of juxtaposition is ok, you may use things like
>
> \,\man
>
> for concatenating stuff, too.
What about event functions? Can a command which does the concatenation be
written as an event function so that the juxtaposit
"R. Padraic Springuel" writes:
>> On Oct 18, 2021, at 5:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> I'd lean towards defining \man like in the question and a function \maN
>> that takes the following markup and concatenates it. That's viciously
>> unclever but sometimes not having to worry whether the c
> On Oct 18, 2021, at 5:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> I'd lean towards defining \man like in the question and a function \maN
> that takes the following markup and concatenates it. That's viciously
> unclever but sometimes not having to worry whether the computer gets
> everything right is its
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 18/10/2021 à 21:22, R. Padraic Springuel a écrit :
>> I’m using some functions to allow me to select words in the lyrics
>> of some hymns in a systematic way so that the same hymn can be used
>> referring to one or more persons (and in some cases, either a man or
>> a
Le 18/10/2021 à 21:22, R. Padraic Springuel a écrit :
I’m using some functions to allow me to select words in the lyrics of some
hymns in a systematic way so that the same hymn can be used referring to one or
more persons (and in some cases, either a man or a woman). These functions
work just
I’m using some functions to allow me to select words in the lyrics of some
hymns in a systematic way so that the same hymn can be used referring to one or
more persons (and in some cases, either a man or a woman). These functions
work just fine when they appear in the lyrics by themselves, but
13 matches
Mail list logo
