On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:46:03PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe the code is ugly (my first scheme routine) and may be enhenced.
> I thing about:
> - use relative music whitout being messed u by octave shifts
> - abbility to change tags
> - put all in a scm file instead
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:05:53PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> The first thing to do is to observe what the input music looks like, and
> what the output of your function should look like, using
> \displayMusic. The purpose of your function will then be to transform
> one into the oth
Sebastien Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The question is how to factorise an expression like:
> \tag #'tab {4} tag #'score {8 ~ }
> to something like:
>
> \tabRhythme {} #'(4) #'(8 8)
>
> I thought to write a function like:
>
> tabRhythme = #(define-music-function (parser location music tab s
Hi all
I do use lilypond for a while and I have a recurent problem when
splitting notes to feat to a beat.
Let's see a simple example:
[1]:
relative c { c4. 4 c8 4 }
This produce a nice output but:
[2]:
\relative c { c4 ~ c8 8 ~ c8 4 }
I think this is more readble on a staff. Anyway I also d
