On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:30:23 +0100
Siska Ádám wrote:
> while \glissando is a simple solution, it gives a very narrow line --
> which I didn't find how I could make thicker -- and there's
> absolutely no control over the shape of the line (so one can't make a
> non-linear glissando with it).
>
On 2012.03.10., at 10:23, Tiresia GIUNO wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:30:23 +0100
> Siska Ádám wrote:
>> while \glissando is a simple solution, it gives a very narrow line --
>> which I didn't find how I could make thicker -- and there's
>> absolutely no control over the shape of the line (so on
Siska Ádám-4 wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
>
> I'm investigating how one could implement a glissando. So far, I've found
> three solutions:
>
> - \glissando itself
> - \makeClusters with a single note instead of a chord
> - \markup (with \beam, \path or \postscript)
>
> while \glissando is a simp
Hello list,
I'm investigating how one could implement a glissando. So far, I've found three
solutions:
- \glissando itself
- \makeClusters with a single note instead of a chord
- \markup (with \beam, \path or \postscript)
while \glissando is a simple solution, it gives a very narrow line -- wh
