Hi Calixte,
> I think the question is more: “will machines be able to engrave scores that
> don’t need tweaks or human correction at all.”
Yes.
> Maybe, but in my opinion — except if you implement something like an AI — it
> will never have the difference that makes traditional engraving so lo
I think the question is more: “will machines be able to engrave scores that
don’t need tweaks or human correction at all.”
Maybe, but in my opinion — except if you implement something like an AI —
it will never have the difference that makes traditional engraving so
lovely (everything is not perfec
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:22:54 +0200, Eyolf Østrem wrote:
On 24.04.2015 (14:12), tyronicus wrote:
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
> I should’ve written “I believe that nothing as beautiful/good as
this
> will ever be engraved by a machine” then, since basically it is my
> belief. Maybe I exaggerated a li
Eyolf Østrem wrote
> A machine may draw a more geometrically perfect circle, but if I were to
> hang the drawing on my wall, I'd much rather have one made by Mirò than by
> a
> machine. Same with notation.
Music notation may be at times a graphic art, but isn't it more often a tool
for communicati
On 24.04.2015 (14:12), tyronicus wrote:
> Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
> > I should’ve written “I believe that nothing as beautiful/good as this
> > will ever be engraved by a machine” then, since basically it is my
> > belief. Maybe I exaggerated a little :-)
> > And you may believe differently of cou
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
> I should’ve written “I believe that nothing as beautiful/good as this
> will ever be engraved by a machine” then, since basically it is my
> belief. Maybe I exaggerated a little :-)
> And you may believe differently of course.
My contrary belief: A machine will draw a ci
Am 24.04.2015 um 20:25 schrieb Larry Kent:
I'm trying to decide if the last sentence (referring to the scores at
the 3 links) is made in jest. It must be, right?
I should’ve written “I believe that nothing as beautiful/good as this
will ever be engraved by a machine” then, since basically it is
