Hi all,
Everybody who might consider a trip to Berlin should read this post:
http://lilypondblog.org/2015/04/der-rosenkavalier-chamber-version-with-berlin-philharmonic-orchestra/
Well, everybody else too ;-)
I have seen the production in Baden-Baden, and I can wholeheartedly
recommend attending
inear "page by page" fashion (similar to breaking the
piece into multiple bookparts).
So I suppose the performance issue is more about memory consumption than
about algorithmic runtime complexity.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Lilypond-performance-tp29356340p294
Urs Liska writes:
> Well, this seems a misunderstanding, mainly due to my English and the
> fact, that I only have very intermediate programming experience with
> very little theoretical background.
> I think basically we want to say the same thing :-)
I consider this extremely unlikely.
> I do
Well, this seems a misunderstanding, mainly due to my English and the
fact, that I only have very intermediate programming experience with
very little theoretical background.
I think basically we want to say the same thing :-)
I don't find it natural to "walk through" the music from beginning t
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 07.08.2010 09:14, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:26:15AM -0700, ornello wrote:
>>>
In my installation, Lilypond runtime seems to increase exponentially (at
least not linearly) with the number of pa
Am 07.08.2010 09:14, schrieb David Kastrup:
Graham Percival writes:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:26:15AM -0700, ornello wrote:
In my installation, Lilypond runtime seems to increase exponentially (at
least not linearly) with the number of pages to engrave. Is there any option
to speed
ge in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Lilypond-performance-tp29356340p29386310.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:26:15AM -0700, ornello wrote:
>> In my installation, Lilypond runtime seems to increase exponentially (at
>> least not linearly) with the number of pages to engrave. Is there any option
>> to speed up Lilypond, e.g. by removing time-consuming e
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:54:01PM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 22:31, Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > There's a section in the Learning manual called "speeding up
> > lilypond", or something like that. This sounds like a good place
> > to look.
>
> Are you speaking of LM 4.6.5
On 6 August 2010 22:31, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> There's a section in the Learning manual called "speeding up
> lilypond", or something like that. This sounds like a good place
> to look.
Hi Graham,
Are you speaking of LM 4.6.5 Avoiding tweaks with slower processing ?
It is not really speaki
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:26:15AM -0700, ornello wrote:
> In my installation, Lilypond runtime seems to increase exponentially (at
> least not linearly) with the number of pages to engrave. Is there any option
> to speed up Lilypond, e.g. by removing time-consuming engravers, such that
> the perfo
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 05:26 -0700, ornello wrote:
> In my installation, Lilypond runtime seems to increase exponentially (at
> least not linearly) with the number of pages to engrave. Is there any option
> to speed up Lilypond, e.g. by removing time-consuming engravers, such that
> the performance
On 5 August 2010 14:26, ornello wrote:
>
> In my installation, Lilypond runtime seems to increase exponentially
> (at least not linearly) with the number of pages to engrave.
> Is there any option to speed up Lilypond, e.g. by removing time-
> consuming engravers, such that the performance only in
pages?
I know about the skipTypesetting and showLastLength options, but I want to
engrave the entire piece, no matter if the typesetting quality was slightly
impaired.
I have attached some of the data I collected to measure Lilypond
performance:
#pages 1 2 3 4 5
14 matches
Mail list logo
