Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:26:29 +0200 David Kastrup wrote: > Well, we've expected the next stable for months now. If the > expectation does not turn out true, it might make sense to get a > _timely_ report about just was the problem with 2.14. I am not > particularly fond of the message that putti

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread David Kastrup
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote: >> > 'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in > Fedora 17' Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. >> >>> That sounds

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote: 'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17' Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. That sounds like imprudent policy. Packaging an unstable version shou

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote: 'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17' Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. That sounds like imprudent policy. Packaging an unstable version should only be done by somebody committed to tracking

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread David Kastrup
Pavel Roskin writes: > Quoting James : > >> 'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in >> Fedora 17' > > Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. In my understanding, > it means that the maintainer believes that a new stable version of > Lilypond will be released

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting James : 'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17' Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. In my understanding, it means that the maintainer believes that a new stable version of Lilypond will be released before or shortly after Fedora

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread James
Hello, On 30 April 2012 10:16, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2012/4/30 James : >> Martin, >> >> On 29 April 2012 17:28, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ? >> >> You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it. > >

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/4/30 James : > Martin, > > On 29 April 2012 17:28, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ? > > You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it. No Fedora maintainer can package LilyPond 2.16 if it has not been re

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-30 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, James wrote: Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ? You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it. No one as far as I know who contributes to the LP project does this actively. I'm not that technically savvy on this topic, but

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-29 Thread James
Martin, On 29 April 2012 17:28, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > Hi, > > Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ? You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it. No one as far as I know who contributes to the LP project does this actively. I'm not that technic

Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-29 Thread David Kastrup
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > Hi, > > Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ? First it needs to get accepted in LilyPond. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/li

Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17

2012-04-29 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
Hi, Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ? -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user