Am 09.09.2013 06:40, schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Am 2013-09-08 um 21:18 schrieb David Rogers :
Henning Hraban Ramm writes:
I’m the one behind the previous lilypond module for ConTeXt and the current
LilyPond filter suggestion.
For me, it works great (besides the usual layout problems wit
Am 2013-09-08 um 21:18 schrieb David Rogers :
> Henning Hraban Ramm writes:
>
>> I’m the one behind the previous lilypond module for ConTeXt and the current
>> LilyPond filter suggestion.
>> For me, it works great (besides the usual layout problems with TeX).
>>
>> I guess the matter is, what
Am 08.09.2013 17:18, schrieb David Rogers:
Henning Hraban Ramm writes:
Am 2013-09-06 um 23:12 schrieb David Rogers :
Hello
There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
more-flexible system somewhat analo
Henning Hraban Ramm writes:
> Am 2013-09-06 um 23:12 schrieb David Rogers :
>
>> Hello
>> There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
>> integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
>> more-flexible system somewhat analogous to LaTeX).
>>
>> Right now
Am 08.09.2013 11:20, schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Am 2013-09-06 um 23:50 schrieb Marc Hohl :
Am 06.09.2013 19:12, schrieb David Rogers:
Hello
There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
more-flexible sys
Am 2013-09-08 um 16:28 schrieb David Kastrup :
Right now, which is the best choice for putting ConTeXt and LilyPond
together? (Your answer might be "Don't bother, just use LaTeX", if you
have a good reason for saying that.)
>>>
>>> Hehe – just use LaTeX ;-)
>>
>> I would not. Let
Henning Hraban Ramm writes:
> Am 2013-09-06 um 23:50 schrieb Marc Hohl :
>
>> Am 06.09.2013 19:12, schrieb David Rogers:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
>>> integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
>>> more-flexible s
Am 2013-09-06 um 23:50 schrieb Marc Hohl :
> Am 06.09.2013 19:12, schrieb David Rogers:
>> Hello
>>
>> There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
>> integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
>> more-flexible system somewhat analogous to LaTeX).
>>
Am 2013-09-06 um 23:12 schrieb David Rogers :
> Hello
> There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
> integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
> more-flexible system somewhat analogous to LaTeX).
>
> Right now, which is the best choice for putting
2013/9/6 Marc Hohl :
> You may find that the spacing between staff lines is not optimal
> when using lilypond-book, but a suitable definition for
> \betweenLilyPondSystem may help in this case.
In that case you may be interested in reading this
http://lilypondblog.org/2013/07/creating-songbooks-wi
Am 06.09.2013 19:12, schrieb David Rogers:
Hello
There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
more-flexible system somewhat analogous to LaTeX).
Right now, which is the best choice for putting ConTeXt and L
Hello
There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
more-flexible system somewhat analogous to LaTeX).
Right now, which is the best choice for putting ConTeXt and LilyPond
together? (Your answer might be "Don'
12 matches
Mail list logo
