Thank you all for your advised suggestions !
On 6 March 2011 21:46, Michael wrote:
> My personal choice is to release my scores under the terms of the CC-BY-SA
> license. CC-BY is almost PD, only requiring attribution.
>
> (Sorry if this sent twice, I got an error the first time)
>
> Regards,
>
Am Sonntag, 6. März 2011, um 16:05:06 schrieb Voyageur Galactique:
> I wonder what license is the most adequate. A natural choice would be
> to release it as "public domain" but it seems this notion is not
> accepted in all country. I think I will release it as CC BY or CC
> BY-SA
If you want to a
Ok I found an answer to the 2nd question:
In most cases a special exception provided for GPL fonts.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException
It is the case for the emmentaler font.
On 6 March 2011 16:05, Voyageur Galactique
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to publish some lilypond transcrip
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 04:05:06PM +0100, Voyageur Galactique wrote:
> 1/ What license would you personnaly chose and why ?
I would use whatever was recommended by
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/index.html
since they have the most experience in this area.
> 2/ What license am I allowed to chose fo
Hi,
I want to publish some lilypond transcriptions of old scores available
as public domain ressources.
I wonder what license is the most adequate. A natural choice would be
to release it as "public domain" but it seems this notion is not
accepted in all country. I think I will release it as CC B
