On Thu 10 Mar 2016 at 10:19:29 (-0600), Cynthia Karl wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:04:57 -0700 (MST) tisimst
> schrieb:
> >
> > HTH,
> > Abraham
> >
> > P.S. Some of the power users on this list filter inline images, so if you
> > wouldn't mind making the image an attachment next time, I know
At 10:56 10/03/2016 -0600, Matthew Skala wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Brian Barker wrote:
At 10:33 10/03/2016 -0600, Matthew Skala wrote:
... HTML in email is usually spam.
You are joking, of course!
No.
OK, I'll rephrase that to help you: either you *have to be* joking or
you are plain w
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Brian Barker wrote:
> At 10:33 10/03/2016 -0600, Matthew Skala wrote:
> > ... HTML in email is usually spam.
>
> You are joking, of course!
No.
--
Matthew Skala
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
At 10:33 10/03/2016 -0600, Matthew Skala wrote:
... HTML in email is usually spam.
You are joking, of course!
Brian Barker
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
aving in-line images, I
just know that some other regular list followers have mentioned this in the
past. Perhaps doing both is how to satisfy both worlds, like you said?
Best,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Inline-images-was-Re-Variable-slur-thic
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Cynthia Karl wrote:
> Why on earth would anyone filter inline images?
I filter HTML, because HTML in email is usually spam. "Inline" images
imply HTML and thus get filtered too.
--
Matthew Skala
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles.
http://ansuz
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:04:57 -0700 (MST) tisimst
schrieb:
>
> HTH,
> Abraham
>
> P.S. Some of the power users on this list filter inline images, so if you
> wouldn't mind making the image an attachment next time, I know they'll
> appreciate it. :-)
Why on earth would anyone filter inline image
