Am 26.05.2012 18:23, schrieb Jeff Barnes:
Thanks for the replies, everyone.
David Kastrup wrote:
\relative c' takes a music expression as an argument, and in this case,
the argument is the parallel music<< ...>>.
Interesting. Does \voiceXXX take a music expression too? If so, can I set the
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Barnes"
To: "David Kastrup" ;
I looked at the grammar at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/lilypond-grammar.
Where is \voiceXXX defined?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices
--
Phil Holmes
_
Thanks for the replies, everyone.
David Kastrup wrote:
> \relative c' takes a music expression as an argument, and in this case,
> the argument is the parallel music << ... >>.
Interesting. Does \voiceXXX take a music expression too? If so, can I set the
bounds of the expression with {}?
> I
Jeff Barnes writes:
> This snippet illustrates a problem I'm having. The tie on the g is in
> the wrong direction after I've finished with the voice split. How do I
> get the correct tie direction? It looks like the \voices are still in
> scope wrt ties.
>
> Also, why did I lose the \relative c'
Write ^ or _ before the tilde to force the tie up or down.
Works also with articulations, slurs and many other things.
Best
Urs
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Jeff Barnes schrieb:
This snippet illustrates a problem I'm having. The tie on the g
This snippet illustrates a problem I'm having. The tie on the g is in the wrong
direction after I've finished with the voice split. How do I get the correct
tie direction? It looks like the \voices are still in scope wrt ties.
Also, why did I lose the \relative c' after the voice split?
\score
