Lj,
-Original Message-
From: "l...@internet.com.uy"
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:45:26 -0200
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
>
>> Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
>> #+inf.0 without any
Hello
-Original Message-
From: "l...@internet.com.uy"
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:45:26 -0200
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
>>Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
>>#+inf.0 without any extra
Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
#+inf.0 without any extra tweaks *should* work in all cases or not. If it
should then we have a bug and it should be reported as such.
yes, i think that the tweak definitely should work without further
tweaks. it looks mor
Hello
-Original Message-
From: "l...@internet.com.uy"
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:57:02 -0200
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: RE: horizontal beams
>
>> I don't know how the code works, but as someone who browses the LSR
>> I would just say
I don't know how the code works, but as someone who browses the LSR
I would just say that there is only one tweak needed, but you are
implying there are cases when you need more than one tweak.
i'm not implying, i'm saying it quite explicitly. and i sent a
complete example demonstrating
LLj
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of l...@internet.com.uy
> Sent: 21 January 2011 12:11
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: RE: horizo
James Lowe escribió:
So if you know that it does not guarantee horizontal beams then the
snippet is wrong and it needs to be corrected, I can only go on what
I am told in the documentation or the snippet repository. So there
is no point adding another snippet to the documentation when we
Lj
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
l...@internet.com.uy
Sent: 20 January 2011 10:18
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
James, i must say i&#
how to use one does it not?
???
my first post included an example (with images and all) showing that the tweak
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 by itself does not guarantee
horizontal beams in all cases. were you following the thread at all?
Lj
-Original Message-
From:
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:44:50 -0200
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
>"Dmytro O. Redchuk" escribió:
>
>
>> \override Beam #'details #'round-to-zero-slope = #0
>> \overr
eams, but
i manually avoided them). perhaps this could be added to the manual?
for my part, i think it would be a good idea to add a simple
expression to lilypond (with a robust function behind it) to get
horizontal beams. do others agree with this? i think it's a common
situation, and a sp
On Wed 19 Jan 2011, 11:08 l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
>
> i'm using \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 to get horizontal beams
> (the only hack i know and that i could find to get horizontal
> beams). but more or less randomly some groups of notes are rendered
> with some
Nick Payne wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 October 2008 06:55
To: Nick Payne
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Drum parts and horizontal beams
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
The Beam damping property is still probably what you
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 October 2008 06:55
> To: Nick Payne
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Drum parts and horizontal beams
>
> Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> >
> >
> > Nic
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
You could also go to the LilyPond Snippet Repository and search for beam:
If you are feeling lucky you could also google for
beam horizontal inurl:v2-11 site:lilypond.org/doc/
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
perties
without
getting anything but horizontal beams.
Nick
The Beam damping property is still probably what you want to adjust. If
you give it a value like 10 you should get a slight tilt to the beam:
'positions = #'(3 . 4), and the second beam uses the
automatic placing. I'd like every beam to have the same slope as the 1st
without having to add a beam position override for every bar. I played
around with overriding the concaveness and damping beam properties without
getting anyt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Carl D. Sorensen
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 October 2008 01:58
> To: canduc; lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Drum parts and horizontal beams
>
> On 10/20/08 11:26 AM,
ation Reference as one big page, and searched for
damping. The very first hit was a snippet for horizontal beams (in the
section on Tablature, which was why I remembered it, because I do more
guitar than drum music).
You could also go to the LilyPond Snippet Repository and search for beam:
ht
}
\new DrumVoice {
\stemDown bd8. bd8 bd16 sn8 [r bd] bd [bd16 bd r bd] sn8 bd sn
}
>>
}
}
Can anyone help me?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Drum-parts-and-horizontal-beams-tp20074666p20074666.html
Sent from the G
Add this code inside each \new DrumVoice block:
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
So a whole block looks like this:
\new DrumVoice {
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
\stemUp cymc8 \repeat unfold 10 hhho cymc
}
Jon
canduc wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm trying to w
}
\new DrumVoice {
\stemDown bd8. bd8 bd16 sn8 [r bd] bd [bd16 bd r bd] sn8 bd sn
}
>>
}
}
Can anyone help me?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Drum-parts-and-horizontal-beams-tp20074779p20074779.html
Sent from the G
rumming).
Unfortunately, the 'r' for rests (and 'R' for multimeasure rests and 's'
for spacer notes)
are hard coded in the program.
Can you have _really_ horizontal beams (possibly always at the same hight)?
The following line does not work, the beams are still
Hi, I'm using Lilypond 2.10.25 and I have a few questions...
Is it possible to redefine the "rest note name" 'r' and instead use e.g. 'p'
for rests. I'd really like to use 'r' for something else (right hand strokes in
drumming).
Can you have
I know this has been asked before, but I haven't found an answer:
Is there a way to automatically make all beams flat, or to automatically
make a certain beam flat?
Searching the documentation and lilypond-user, I found two methods,
neither of them sufficient.
The first method,
\overri
See also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-10/msg3.html
/Mats
Trevor Bača wrote:
On 10/2/06, David Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is there any functionality to notate horizontal beams? I'm notating
drum music
and the beams are typically drawn h
On 10/2/06, David Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is there any functionality to notate horizontal beams? I'm notating drum music
and the beams are typically drawn horizontally to avoid slanted beams becoming
distracting.
Hi David,
Try overriding the 'positions attri
Hi,
Is there any functionality to notate horizontal beams? I'm notating drum music
and the beams are typically drawn horizontally to avoid slanted beams becoming
distracting.
regards,
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
To get horizontal beams (I know, they're usually horrible, but essential
in drum scores) the manual suggest to set beam damping to 10. I
tried even 10, but still they are not really horizontal.
Rune Zedeler proposed in 2002 on this list a hack to that purpose, but
know it c
Bruno Tournay wrote:
> In v1.6 the height property has disappeared. In documentation, I saw something
>called damping, but I'm not even sure of its purpose... I tried to set it to 10
>(as said in doc: "10: horizontal beams"). I think it actually changed the sha
unique.
Now my question is: how can I get horizontal beams ?
Recently I upgraded from version 1.4 to 1.6 (1.6.4). With version 1.4 I was using the
following beam properties:
\property Voice.Beam \set #'height = #0
\property Voice.Beam \set #'staff-position = #4
In v1.6 the heigh
31 matches
Mail list logo
