PROTECTED]
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:50:47 -0700
Subject: GTK and LilyPond
I use LilyPond 2.10.29 on Windows 2000.
I've long noticed that installing the GTK separately from LilyPond (as it is
needed for other programs) sometimes causes problems (and so does insta
Mark wrote:
> That is pretty weird. Does anyone else here have Windows 2000 who
> would be willing to test this (to see if it's just me)? Windows
> 2000 and XP should be essentially the same with this, though . . .
> hence the weirdness on my part.
>
> I'll have to try it on another computer
That is pretty weird. Does anyone else here have Windows 2000 who would be
willing to test this (to see if it's just me)? Windows 2000 and XP should be
essentially the same with this, though . . . hence the weirdness on my part.
I'll have to try it on another computer if I ever get the chance
2007/9/11, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is weird! I have had GIMP and LilyPond installed on the
> same machine (Win XP) and have kept updating LilyPond every
> now and then. Still, GIMP works without any problems.
There are many different GIMP installation packs for windows. I
rememb
This is weird! I have had GIMP and LilyPond installed on the
same machine (Win XP) and have kept updating LilyPond every
now and then. Still, GIMP works without any problems.
/Mats
Mark Dewey wrote:
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/9/11, Mark Dewey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anyway, whenever I i
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/9/11, Mark Dewey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Anyway, whenever I install LilyPond, GIMP doesn't work anymore because of
something to do with this.
I don't know which GTK applications you're using, but the opposite
could be done easily, i.e. standard LilyPond installatio
2007/9/11, Mark Dewey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Anyway, whenever I install LilyPond, GIMP doesn't work anymore because of
> something to do with this.
I don't know which GTK applications you're using, but the opposite
could be done easily, i.e. standard LilyPond installation, *but*
instead of using
Mark Dewey writes:
> Is it possible to get a distribution of LilyPond that doesn't have
> the GTK or GTK elements bundled, but rather just relies on the one
> already installed?
That's probably not possible. Windows knows no packaging system,
there is no dependency resolving and every package ju
I use LilyPond 2.10.29 on Windows 2000.
I've long noticed that installing the GTK separately from LilyPond (as it is
needed for other programs) sometimes causes problems (and so does installing
LilyPond after installing the separate GTK).
Is it possible to get a distribution of LilyPond that d
