Shape notes is not only about making it easier to read, is it? It's
closer to a notational system of its own. The affinities with
solmization are strong, and even though that too had an educational
function, it went way beyond that.
Fingering: sure, it's educational too, but again, I wouldn't have
On 14.09.2007 (13:10), Graham Percival wrote:
> Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> >I don't like the sectioning of this one. Why is "Transpose" and
> >"Instrument transpositions" split up? It doesn't make sense to me.
> >Ottava brackets should also belong here somewhere.
> Instrument transpositions affects how
2007/9/14, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > o 1.7 Educational use (or "increasing readibility" ?)
> They make the music easier to read. Again, I'm not wild about the
> section name, as you can tell from the (?) in the name.
> I'm quite happy with having a section that includes those
Eyolf Østrem wrote:
On 14.09.2007 (08:23), Graham Percival wrote:
http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Doc
* 1 Notation Reference
o 1.1 Pitches
I don't like the sectioning of this one. Why is "Transpose" and
"Instrument transpositions" split up? It doesn't make sense to
On 14.09.2007 (08:23), Graham Percival wrote:
> http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Doc
* 1 Notation Reference
o 1.1 Pitches
I don't like the sectioning of this one. Why is "Transpose" and
"Instrument transpositions" split up? It doesn't make sense to me.
Ottava brackets s
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/9/14, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ancient notation _could_ be split genre-wise into two separate chunks
"Gregorian Chant" and "Mensural Notation". However, for a _reference_
manual, I think it is ok as it currently is (e.g. having a single section
on liga
2007/9/14, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ancient notation _could_ be split genre-wise into two separate chunks
> "Gregorian Chant" and "Mensural Notation". However, for a _reference_
> manual, I think it is ok as it currently is (e.g. having a single section
> on ligatures rather than sep
Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Just one question: due to the alignement and their "timing effect",
wouldn't it be judicious to move the "grace notes" to the "1.2.6 Special
rhythmic concerns", at least through a link?
Of course we'll have @seealso links everywhere in the manual. That's
not a
Le 14.09.2007 17:23, Graham Percival disait :
http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Doc
Sounds very promising. I like this progressive discovery.
Just one question: due to the alignement and their "timing effect",
wouldn't it be judicious to move the "grace notes" to the "1.2.6
Just for the record:
Ancient notation _could_ be split genre-wise into two separate chunks
"Gregorian Chant" and "Mensural Notation". However, for a _reference_
manual, I think it is ok as it currently is (e.g. having a single section
on ligatures rather than separate ones per genre). For a
http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Doc
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
11 matches
Mail list logo
