Re: Figured bass spacing problem

2003-07-24 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Thursday 24 July 2003 08:00 pm, Mark Hymers wrote: > On Thu, 24, Jul, 2003 at 06:20:02PM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold spoke > thus.. > > > 6 > > 5 6 > > > > possibly mean? Either you have the interval of the 6th or you > > don't. > > No no no! > > I'm talking about layout - that's for two differ

Re: Figured bass spacing problem

2003-07-24 Thread Mark Hymers
On Thu, 24, Jul, 2003 at 06:20:02PM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold spoke thus.. > 6 > 5 6 > > possibly mean? Either you have the interval of the 6th or you don't. No no no! I'm talking about layout - that's for two different fingerings: (pretend there's a bass clef at the start) ,---

Re: Figured bass spacing problem

2003-07-24 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Thursday 24 July 2003 11:32 am, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I've changed this in 1.7 CVS, by introducing > > > alignBassFigureAccidentals. It defaults to off, which produces > > > your desired notation. Is this the official notation? > > > > I think so yes. Certain

Re: Figured bass spacing problem

2003-07-24 Thread Mark Hymers
On Thu, 24, Jul, 2003 at 05:32:47PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys spoke thus.. > People don't seem to agree on the proper format of the figures. Can > you provide me with definite references? Not off-hand but I'll do some research and get back to you. Mark -- Mark Hymers "I got off at Durham... an

Re: Figured bass spacing problem

2003-07-24 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I've changed this in 1.7 CVS, by introducing > > alignBassFigureAccidentals. It defaults to off, which produces your > > desired notation. Is this the official notation? > > I think so yes. Certainly it's much better than the old rendering. If > an accidental is the

Re: Figured bass spacing problem

2003-07-23 Thread Mark Hymers
On Thu, 17, Jul, 2003 at 06:52:14PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys spoke thus.. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > The problem is that when I'm trying to display an accidental without a > > number it doesn't line up properly. > > > > So, for example (#=sharp, b=flat !=natural): > > > > 4# > > b > > >

Figured bass spacing problem

2003-07-17 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The problem is that when I'm trying to display an accidental without a > number it doesn't line up properly. > > So, for example (#=sharp, b=flat !=natural): > > 4# > b > > instead of > 4# > b I've changed this in 1.7 CVS, by introducing alignBassFigureAccidentals