compiled fine for a long time before 2.19.21.
Andrew
From: Simon Albrecht [mailto:simon.albre...@mail.de]
Sent: Friday, 12 June 2015 9:11 AM
To: Andrew Bernard; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fedora 22 core dumping bug
Hello,
just a sidenote:
Am 11.06.2015 um 17:26 schrieb
Hello,
just a sidenote:
Am 11.06.2015 um 17:26 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
% Turn off tuplet bracket and number.
tupletOff = #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
#{
\once \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##f
\once \override Tuple
Greetings All,
Lilypond 2.19.21 has had problems with the Fedora 22 release. These have
mostly been solved by the recent upgrade to fontconfig on that platform. I
have had a very difficult situation with lilypond dumping core on a very
complex score that I am developing, now made somewhat
Hi,
I just updated fontconfig from 2.11.93 to version-2.11.94 (now in
updates-testing) on Fedora 22
$ sudo dnf update --enablerepo=*testing update fontconfig*
And a quick test shows Lilypond started working again :-)
--
MT
___
lilypond-user
Yes it's known. Use the Linux installer from lilypond.org for now.
MT
On 30 mei 2015 4:41:51 AM Andrew Bernard wrote:
Greetings All,
Neither the 64 bit binary build nor a carefully self compiled version of
2.19.21 work on the recently released Fedora 22. A bunch of issues, m
Greetings All,
Neither the 64 bit binary build nor a carefully self compiled version of
2.19.21 work on the recently released Fedora 22. A bunch of issues, mostly
crashing, leading to total unusability. Is anybody else having the same
difficulties?
Andrew
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il giorno sab 16 mag 2015 alle 17:40, Martin Tarenskeen
ha scritto:
In Fedora 22 the "yum" command has been replaced by "dnf".
Unfortately "dnf remove remove lilypond" automatically also removes the
"python-ly&
Il giorno sab 16 mag 2015 alle 17:40, Martin Tarenskeen
ha scritto:
In Fedora 22 the "yum" command has been replaced by "dnf".
Unfortately "dnf remove remove lilypond" automatically also removes
the "python-ly" and "frescobaldi" packages.
I don't know about F22 and dfn, but pre-F22 rpm and yum had options to
prevent following dependencies.
Alternativey, you can make a dummy rpm package that provides the lilypond
dependency and install that. Then you can add python-ly and frescobaldi.
-- Johan
_
Hi,
Since the Fedora 22 (beta) package of LilyPond doesn't work I decided to
remove ("sudo dnf remove lilypond") lilypond from my system for now and
downloaded and installed the Linux installer version from the LilyPond
website instead. This one does work because it inc
Could you post the verbose output, please?
You talk about 2.19.20: is this self-compiled?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: N. Andrew Walsh
To: Jon Ciesla
Cc: Phil Holmes ; lilypond-user mailinglist
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora 22
erbose output, please?
>
> You talk about 2.19.20: is this self-compiled?
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* N. Andrew Walsh
> *To:* Jon Ciesla
> *Cc:* Phil Holmes ; lilypond-user mailinglist
>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 01, 2015
>> windows installation shows 9.15 when I run it. Your version shows 9.16,
>> which may be the problem. Do you know where this is being picked up from?
>>
>> --
>> Phil Holmes
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> *From:* Scott Mi
nglist
> *Sent:* Friday, May 01, 2015 1:38 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Fedora 22
>
> Another confirmed, Fedora 22. The Fedora repo supplied lilypond 2.19.18
> fails to compile anything. Here is a log:
>
> http://fpaste.org/217530/
>
>
> --
>
: lilypond-user mailinglist
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora 22
Another confirmed, Fedora 22. The Fedora repo supplied lilypond 2.19.18 fails
to compile anything. Here is a log:
http://fpaste.org/217530
Another confirmed, Fedora 22. The Fedora repo supplied lilypond 2.19.18
fails to compile anything. Here is a log:
http://fpaste.org/217530/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
devs will get
to it, because I can't compile anything either (even really stupidly simple
MWEs).
Cheers,
A
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Martin Tarenskeen
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Can anyone confirm that
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone confirm that lilypond (2.19.18) in Fedora 22 Beta currently is
unusable, probably due to problems with Ghostscript? (9.16)
It's not working for me. (compilation of *.ly files fails)
I am talking about the lilypond package
Hi,
Can anyone confirm that lilypond (2.19.18) in Fedora 22 Beta currently is
unusable, probably due to problems with Ghostscript? (9.16)
It's not working for me. (compilation of *.ly files fails)
--
MT
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lil
Hi,
I am giving Fedora 22 (alpha release) a try - just curiosity.
It seems it currently has lilypond-2.19.18 in updates-testing.
I am not sure having "unstable development versions" in official
distributions repo is a good idea, is it
Hi others and Pierre,
They or someone has changed the syntax highlighting colors in Fedora 22.
I hope it was not you Pierre. I find the syntax highlighting terrible on
my notebook.
I don't know if users of this list can effect any changes so parallel I
will try to contact someone in
21 matches
Mail list logo
