Nice!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Noeck writes:
> Dear bug-squad,
>
> Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Noeck:
>> #'tab vs. tab
>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags
>
>
> Btw, is it worth to change the docs and suggest the #'-less syntax to
> users or rather not?
We
2018-04-06 18:38 GMT+02:00 Larry Morandi :
> I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I
> include on my individual parts. I'm finding that I get extraneous partial
> tab clefs and lines placed in my output whenever a "TabStaff.minimumFret"
> definition is found.
>
> So I
Dear bug-squad,
Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Noeck:
> #'tab vs. tab
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags
Btw, is it worth to change the docs and suggest the #'-less syntax to
users or rather not?
Joram
_
Noeck writes:
> Am 06.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Seriously?
>>
>> \removeWithTag tab \new Staff { \melody }
>
> Is that a remark to #'tab vs. tab
Nope.
> or is there a benefit of putting \removeWithTag before the \new Staff?
If you worry about extraneous contexts being created
Am 06.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Seriously?
>
> \removeWithTag tab \new Staff { \melody }
Is that a remark to #'tab vs. tab or is there a benefit of putting
\removeWithTag before the \new Staff?
In the first case: that’s how it is explained in the docs:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2
Hi David,
I am sorry, I still don’t get it.
Am 06.04.2018 um 19:21 schrieb David Kastrup:
> If you worry about extraneous contexts being created, don't create
> extraneous contexts.
There is no \new and no \context in Larry’s code. That’s what I thought
is called an implicit context creation (I
Thank you, I got it. (I would have replied to the list, but the only button
that appeared on the page was to reply directly to you, and I only get
digests, which are hard to reply to.)
You are right it does work correctly. My fault.
Larry M.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:19 AM Noeck wrote:
> Dear
Dear Larry,
please always reply to the list.
Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Larry Morandi:
> Thanks for your reply. You say that using tags works, but it doesn’t for me
> using the current stable release, 2.18.2. The output look exactly the same
> whether I use tags for not. Are you using 2.19.
Great solution. Thanks.
Larry M.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:23 AM Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2018-04-06 18:38 GMT+02:00 Larry Morandi :
> > I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I
> > include on my individual parts. I'm finding that I get extraneous partial
> > tab cle
Noeck writes:
> Dear Larry,
>
> tags seem to work here: The problem occurs where you set TabStaff
> properties. This setting should be removed when you have no TabStaff.
>
> If you tag the line in melody:
>
> \tag #'tab \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #0
>
> and remove the tagged parts when using m
Dear Larry,
tags seem to work here: The problem occurs where you set TabStaff
properties. This setting should be removed when you have no TabStaff.
If you tag the line in melody:
\tag #'tab \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #0
and remove the tagged parts when using melody:
\new Staff { \remove
I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I
include on my individual parts. I'm finding that I get extraneous partial
tab clefs and lines placed in my output whenever a "TabStaff.minimumFret"
definition is found.
So I'm looking for a way have this fixed, or to do somethi
13 matches
Mail list logo
