Strange. I only have version 2.20.0, but when I change the \version
statement to that, this file compiles for me without errors.
-David
ming tsang writes:
> Hi, David:
>
> Sorry I left the #'( ). Now I removed it and I get the same error message.
> [image: image.png]
> Thanks again,
> waiming
On Thu 08 Jul 2021 at 19:03:23 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> ming tsang writes:
>
> > Dear Lilyponders,
> > How to resolve the GUILE signaled error?
> > The same #( ... ) for other code don't have errors, but line 12 does.
> > I am running with frecobaldi v3.1.3 and lilypond v2.23.3 and in wind
ming tsang writes:
> Hi, David:
>
> Sorry I left the #'( ). Now I removed it
The whole line rather than just the tick mark? Then you change from a
line that is being ignored to a line that isn't there in the first
place.
> and I get the same error message.
--
David Kastrup
Le 08/07/2021 18:03, ming tsang a écrit :
Dear Lilyponders,
How to resolve the GUILE signaled error?
The same #( ... ) for other code don't have errors, but line 12 does.
I am runnin
ming tsang writes:
> Dear Lilyponders,
> How to resolve the GUILE signaled error?
> The same #( ... ) for other code don't have errors, but line 12 does.
> I am running with frecobaldi v3.1.3 and lilypond v2.23.3 and in window 10.
> Thank you for the help.
> waiming Tsang.
> [image: image.png]
I
:39 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Error Code
On 2020-01-27 7:07 pm, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> I am still flummoxed by this matter. I have extracted both into small
> snippets. In both cases they compile. Yet when I add them to the full
> score the one with "(...)&quo
On 2020-01-27 7:07 pm, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
I am still flummoxed by this matter. I have extracted both into small
snippets. In both cases they compile. Yet when I add them to the full
score
the one with "(...)" throws the error.
I have removed code to the last known clean complication. Th
suggest another course of investigation?
Thank you.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Aaron Hill
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 6:14 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Error Code...
On 2020-01-27 5:1
On 2020-01-27 5:14 pm, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
The following compiles correctly:
b8 ([\grace {c32 b a b d\noBeam} c16.])
When the last note, b32, is added:
b8 ([\grace {c32 b a b d\noBeam} c16. b32])
In the future, be sure to always include syntactically-complete MWEs.
The snippets above
Hello All,:
The following compiles correctly:
b8 ([\grace {c32 b a b d\noBeam} c16.])
When the last note, b32, is added:
b8 ([\grace {c32 b a b d\noBeam} c16. b32])
the error code
Exited with return code -1073741819
Comes up.
I am lost. Your help is requested.
Mark
Am 13.11.2016 um 23:16 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Bernhard Kleine writes:
>
>> Am 13.11.2016 um 22:51 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
>>> On 13.11.2016 22:49, Noeck wrote:
Both
\relative c {
1~-- |
|
}
and
\relative {
1~-- |
|
}
Bernhard Kleine writes:
> Am 13.11.2016 um 22:51 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
>> On 13.11.2016 22:49, Noeck wrote:
>>> Both
>>>
>>> \relative c {
>>>1~-- |
>>> |
>>> }
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> \relative {
>>>1~-- |
>>> |
>>> }
>>>
>>> are compiled without problems here (2.19.49, Ubuntu 16.1
… and I confirm the crash with 2.19.47 on the same system.
Segfault, return code 139.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 13.11.2016 um 22:51 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 13.11.2016 22:49, Noeck wrote:
>> Both
>>
>> \relative c {
>>1~-- |
>> |
>> }
>>
>> and
>>
>> \relative {
>>1~-- |
>> |
>> }
>>
>> are compiled without problems here (2.19.49, Ubuntu 16.10, 64bit).
>
> OK, so it’s a bug already fix
On 13.11.2016 22:49, Noeck wrote:
Both
\relative c {
1~-- |
|
}
and
\relative {
1~-- |
|
}
are compiled without problems here (2.19.49, Ubuntu 16.10, 64bit).
OK, so it’s a bug already fixed.
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing li
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Error code -1073741819 with tie and tenuto
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:33:02 -
From: Phil Holmes
To: Simon Albrecht
Semi bisected. Occurs between 19.41 and 19.47.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "
Both
\relative c {
1~-- |
|
}
and
\relative {
1~-- |
|
}
are compiled without problems here (2.19.49, Ubuntu 16.10, 64bit).
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Here, windows 7, amd64, it compiles well, the actual version is 2.19.49.
Your code being rather simple that the origin of that spurious error
message could be sorted out, I hope.
Regards
Bernhard
Am 13.11.2016 um 22:26 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 13.11.2016 22:12, Michael Rivers wrote:
>> I wa
On 13.11.2016 22:12, Michael Rivers wrote:
I was setting a song by Lior Novak and got an error message 1073741819 with
these chords:
Can confirm on Ubuntu. Here’s a smaller example:
\version "2.19.47"
\relative {
1~-- |
|
}
Necessary conditions are the outside-chord tie, the articulation
ut I don't understand why the tying the whole chord that also has a tenuto
throws an error message.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Error-code-1073741819-with-tie-and-tenuto-tp196571.html
Sent from the User mailing list archiv
My guess would be that you have a 64-bit binary version of a utility package
that is also used (and installed) as a 32bit library by lilypond apearing
before Lilypond on the system path.
I've seen other products running into access violations like you mentioned due
to a 64-bit binary trying to
Hi all,
I have reinstalled it once again and it finally works.
Thanks!
Regards,
Brian
发自我的 iPad
> 在 2015年11月2日，上午8:25，guoguocuozuoduo 写道：
>
> Yes, I have reinstalled several times already, but the problem still appears.
>
> 发自我的 iPad
>
>>> 在 2015年11月1日，下午11:18，Nick Payne 写道：
>>>
>>> On 01
Yes, I have reinstalled several times already, but the problem still appears.
发自我的 iPad
> 在 2015年11月1日，下午11:18，Nick Payne 写道：
>
>> On 01/11/2015 18:02, Brian Guo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64 bit)
>> laptop, b
>> laptop, but when I try
On 2015-11-01 11:18, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 18:02, Brian Guo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64
>> bit) laptop, b
>> laptop, but when I try to compile a simple score, such as:
>> \version "2.19.30"
>> \score {
>>\new Staff \relative
On 01/11/2015 18:02, Brian Guo wrote:
Hi,
I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64 bit) laptop,
b
laptop, but when I try to compile a simple score, such as:
\version "2.19.30"
\score {
\new Staff \relative c' {
c
}
}
Have you tried an uninstall/reinstall o
-1073741819(0xc005) means Access Violation, but we need to know a bit more
to find the culprit.
Please run LilyPond with Verbose output-V, --verbose and post the output.
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage#basic-command-line-options-for-lilypond
Hi,
I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64 bit) laptop,
b
laptop, but when I try to compile a simple score, such as:
\version "2.19.30"
\score {
\new Staff \relative c' {
c
}
}
Everything seems to be fine up to "Converting to `document.pdf'...", but th
then I
Thanks for your help. The problem was not including spacer rests for the
opening grace notes in the measure counter.
All the best,
Craig
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 at 20:46 Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2015-08-15 12:17 GMT+02:00 Craig Dabelstein :
> >
> > Hi Lilyponders,
> >
> > When compiling quite a lar
2015-08-15 12:17 GMT+02:00 Craig Dabelstein :
>
> Hi Lilyponders,
>
> When compiling quite a large score I'm getting this error. Could anyone tell
> me where to even start looking for the problem?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Craig
>
>
> Drawing
> systems.../Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/s
Hi Lilyponders,
When compiling quite a large score I'm getting this error. Could anyone
tell me where to even start looking for the problem?
Many thanks,
Craig
Drawing systems...
/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/scm/output-lib.scm:1391:18
<0>: In procedure l
30 matches
Mail list logo
