On Thursday 18 March 2004 14:08, Roland Goretzki wrote:
> Hello list, hello daveA,
>
> You wrote:
> > Thanks for bringing this up. That's a bug, surely.
>
> Is it necessary, that I make a bug-report?
I think it would be good to do so. Mats will say.
> > I asked some time ago for b for flat in e
Hello list, hello daveA,
You wrote:
> The only problem was the h, which may require changing a line. I'm
> not clear about what b-double-flat is. beses? bes? heses? hes?
"heses"!
It is listed in "deutsch.ly", nevertheless I give an explanation:
In german the seven notenames, which refer to
Hello list, hello daveA,
You wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up. That's a bug, surely.
Is it necessary, that I make a bug-report?
> I asked some time ago for b for flat in english.ly. I am reluctant to
> edit it, because it would have to be maintained. Perhaps I should copy
> the language
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 18:55, Roland Goretzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the line
>
> \include "deutsch.ly"
>
> in my .ly-files, but if I use the
>
>\translator { \EasyNotation }
>
> then the result for the english note "b", which in german is called
> "h", is only the english B in the note.
