Hello list, hello Paul,
You wrote:
> Pedro's 2.1.32 packages are now apt-getable.
Thank You. :)
I've tested it, and EasyNotation works like I'd wanted.
But, this version seems to be a little buggy:
A) In a larger Piece (Study op.10,12 from F. Chopin), written with
version 2.1.28 and
Paul Scott wrote:
But I hope the version number will be the same and to get under:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/
Is this correct?
Pedro's 2.1.32 packages are now apt-getable. You may have to do:
dpkg -i --force-all /var/cache/apt/archives/lilypond-doc_2.1.32-1_all.deb
to install l
Roland Goretzki wrote:
This page should tell when your Mac version is ready unless it gets
announced here first:
http://lilypond.org/web/download/#2.1
Oh, on my machine is running debian (unstable).
I just saw Mac in one of your earlier posts. I also run Debian unstable.
But I hope the v
Hello list, hello Paul,
You wrote
> Roland Goretzki wrote:
> >>>In which file could I change the names for the easy-notation-note-names?
> >>in lily/note-head.cc!
> >This file is not to find on my machine.
> >
> He was joking. That's why he said "seriously" below. That is one of
> the source
Roland Goretzki wrote:
Hello list, hello Han-Wen,
You wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In which file could I change the names for the easy-notation-note-names?
in lily/note-head.cc!
This file is not to find on my machine.
He was joking. That's why he said "seriously" belo
Hello list, hello Han-Wen,
You wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > In which file could I change the names for the easy-notation-note-names?
>
> in lily/note-head.cc!
This file is not to find on my machine.
> Seriously, you have found a bug. I've fixed this in CVS, so you can
> set
>
> \o
On Thursday 18 March 2004 14:08, Roland Goretzki wrote:
> Hello list, hello daveA,
>
> You wrote:
> > Thanks for bringing this up. That's a bug, surely.
>
> Is it necessary, that I make a bug-report?
I think it would be good to do so. Mats will say.
> > I asked some time ago for b for flat in e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have the line
>
> \include "deutsch.ly"
>
> in my .ly-files, but if I use the
>
>\translator { \EasyNotation }
>
> then the result for the english note "b", which in german is called "h",
> is only the english B in the note.
>
> Perhaps it could be
Hello list, hello daveA,
You wrote:
> The only problem was the h, which may require changing a line. I'm
> not clear about what b-double-flat is. beses? bes? heses? hes?
"heses"!
It is listed in "deutsch.ly", nevertheless I give an explanation:
In german the seven notenames, which refer to
Hello list, hello daveA,
You wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up. That's a bug, surely.
Is it necessary, that I make a bug-report?
> I asked some time ago for b for flat in english.ly. I am reluctant to
> edit it, because it would have to be maintained. Perhaps I should copy
> the language
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 18:55, Roland Goretzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the line
>
> \include "deutsch.ly"
>
> in my .ly-files, but if I use the
>
>\translator { \EasyNotation }
>
> then the result for the english note "b", which in german is called
> "h", is only the english B in the note.
Hi,
I have the line
\include "deutsch.ly"
in my .ly-files, but if I use the
\translator { \EasyNotation }
then the result for the english note "b", which in german is called "h",
is only the english B in the note.
Perhaps it could be easy to change it by myself:
Par example, it is very
12 matches
Mail list logo
