Re: Dynamics context and vertical positions

2016-03-18 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
ypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-context-and-vertical-positions-tp188571p188599.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Dynamics context and vertical positions

2016-03-16 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 16.03.2016 11:07, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: \layout { \context { \Dynamics \override VerticalAxisGroup.nonstaff-relatedstaff-spacing.basic-distance = #0 } } I wonder why isn't this the default behaviour though, why would people want the Dynamic context so far away from the rel

Re: Dynamics context and vertical positions

2016-03-16 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
marks-attached-to-notes#dynamics as, at least for me, the solution is far from obvious and the default behaviour isn't satisfactory for single staffed instruments. Thanks a lot once again! Cheers, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-c

Re: Dynamics context and vertical positions

2016-03-15 Thread tisimst
ere: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-within-systems <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-within-systems> HTH, Abraham -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-conte

Dynamics context and vertical positions

2016-03-15 Thread Gilberto Agostinho
any overrides I could use for that? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-context-and-vertical-positions-tp188571.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user