On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Helge Kruse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an improvement request.
>
> The dynamic context has a lot of advantages. Most important it makes a
> uniform vertical position of all dynamics in a line. Unfortunately it
> doesn't behave with the horizontal spacing.
>
> The f
Am 06.01.2015 um 21:10 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> You may find the discussion here interesting:
> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=621
Ah! That's interesting. And for me the "workaround" from Keith (comment
#30) solves my problem.
Thanks for pointing this.
Although the internals
2015-01-06 20:21 GMT+01:00 Helge Kruse :
> Can this be confirmed as a bug or an enhancement request? Or is there a
> workaround to make the alignment in the dynamic context working as in
> the staff context?
It's a well known problem.
You may find the discussion here interesting:
https://code.goog
Can this be confirmed as a bug or an enhancement request? Or is there a
workaround to make the alignment in the dynamic context working as in
the staff context?
Best regards
Helge
--
PGP Fingerprint: EDCE F8C8 B727 6CC5 7006 05C1 BD3F EADC 8922 1F61
_
Hello,
I have an improvement request.
The dynamic context has a lot of advantages. Most important it makes a
uniform vertical position of all dynamics in a line. Unfortunately it
doesn't behave with the horizontal spacing.
The following example starts with a spacer rest measure. The \p in the
se
