therfore it does not lead you directly
to an solution), so finally the "issue 34" can be solved in the core of
lilypond one day in the future.
Arnold
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Double-time-signat
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 13.02.2017 18:35, Michael Rivers wrote:
>> I guess it must be incredibly difficult to solve or it would
>> have been solved by now.
>
> Very recently, David Kastrup wrote about having made like half a dozen
> attempts that didn’t work out. And he’s definitely the most
On 13.02.2017 18:35, Michael Rivers wrote:
I guess it must be incredibly difficult to solve or it would
have been solved by now.
Very recently, David Kastrup wrote about having made like half a dozen
attempts that didn’t work out. And he’s definitely the most capable
programmer and the one wi
rs. I know absolutely nothing about the inner
workings, but I guess it must be incredibly difficult to solve or it would
have been solved by now.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Double-time-signature-when-there-are-grace-notes-tp199984p200079.html
Sent fro
2017-02-11 22:49 GMT+01:00 Thomas Weber :
> Am 11.02.2017 um 13:51 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>>
>>
>> Arnold has put up some work to get a more automagic workflow.
>>
>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=990
>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=978
>>
>> IIRC his work is not finished, so you probabl
Am 11.02.2017 um 13:51 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Arnold has put up some work to get a more automagic workflow.
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=990
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=978
IIRC his work is not finished, so you probably will need to fall back
to grace-spacers sometimes...
This
another solution would be to put the spacer grace in a separate variable
(e.g. \global), as opposed to adding invisible graces in every staff ...
cheers
Arne
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Double-time-signature-when-there-are-grace-notes
2017-02-11 8:48 GMT+01:00 Thomas Weber :
> I already realized that:
>
>>> Le 10 févr. 2017 à 23:23, Thomas Weber a écrit :
>>>
>>> * I can add a "grace space" to the bottom staff
>
>
>
> But I tried to avoid this for the following reasons:
>
>
>>> * The staffs won't work standalone ([...] broken s
On 11.02.2017 08:48, Thomas Weber wrote:
Would you work with tags to remove the invisible graces?
Sounds like a good idea.
Of course this is not a nice situation, cumbersome to deal with. But
it’s an extremely hard-to-fix bug also.
Best, Simon
___
Am 10.02.2017 um 23:48 schrieb Jacques Menu Muzhic:
Not a bug, but a feature : you have to add graces in all voices :
I already realized that:
Le 10 févr. 2017 à 23:23, Thomas Weber a écrit :
* I can add a "grace space" to the bottom staff
But I tried to avoid this for the following r
Am 10.02.2017 um 23:48 schrieb Jacques Menu Muzhic:
> Not a bug, but a feature
Well, I'd say a bug but a well known one:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/34/
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.or
Hello Thomas,
Not a bug, but a feature : you have to add graces in all voices :
\version "2.19.44"
<<
{
c'1
\break
\time 15/16
\grace a'16 b'2...
}
{
R1
\break
\time 15/16
\grace s16 c'2...
}
>>
JM
> Le 10 févr. 2017 à 23:23, Thomas Weber a écrit :
>
Dear all,
I need help with the following situation:
\version "2.19.54"
<<
{
c'1
\break
\time 15/16
\grace a'16 b'2...
}
{
R1
\break
\time 15/16
c'2...
}
>>
This results in the attached output. Is that a bug or is this supposed to be
encoded differently? There are dirty w
13 matches
Mail list logo
