Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-10 Thread James Lowe
Neil, -Original Message- From: Neil Puttock Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:04:31 + To: James Lowe Cc: LilyPond User Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12 >On 10 March 2011 18:52, James Lowe wrote: > >> I've added a snippet for approval. > >Great, tha

Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-10 Thread Neil Puttock
On 10 March 2011 18:52, James Lowe wrote: > I've added a snippet for approval. Great, thanks! I've made a few style/coding tweaks (including an override to suppress annoying warning messages for those who like clean compilation) and tagged/approved it. Cheers, Neil ___

RE: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-10 Thread James Lowe
hello, )-Original Message- )From: Neil Puttock [mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com] )Sent: 10 March 2011 18:23 )To: James Lowe )Cc: LilyPond User )Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12 ) )On 10 March 2011 18:18, James Lowe )wrote: ) )> We could add this snippet to the LSR and then

Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-10 Thread Neil Puttock
On 10 March 2011 18:18, James Lowe wrote: > We could add this snippet to the LSR and then add an @known, or (someone) > make a code change to allow any digit to be generated (i.e. we use 0 - 9 but > let users have multiple instances of 0 - 9 so you can get 'fingering' markups > of 9 99 9 9

RE: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-10 Thread James Lowe
Hello, )-Original Message- )From: Neil Puttock [mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com] )Sent: 10 March 2011 18:09 )To: James Lowe )Cc: Robin Bannister; banners...@ccacompanies.com; LilyPond User )Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12 ) )On 9 March 2011 23:18, James Lowe )wrote: ) )>

Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-10 Thread Neil Puttock
On 9 March 2011 23:18, James Lowe wrote: > If this is true I can add an @knownissue in the Notation Reference at > least. Unless anyone objects? It's only true at the most basic level, i.e., using the bare digits, since this is a parser limitation. However, there's nothing stopping you from rol

Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-09 Thread James Lowe
Hello -Original Message- From: Robin Bannister Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:07 +0100 To: , LilyPond User Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12 >This is hardcoded. See >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/msg00691.html > > From:Robin Banniste

Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-09 Thread Robin Bannister
This is hardcoded. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/msg00691.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12

2011-03-08 Thread bannersite
It appears that double digit fingering is not supported in the shorthand version: %error: syntax error, unexpected UNSIGNED I found a reference to using \markup as the long hand and a previous post referencing -\markup { \finger ". . ." } and ^\markup { \finger ". . ." } So I tried without su