On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> >mercial distribution. What I mean is, can something that
>> >has been typesetted with Lilypond and layed out with
>> >LaTeX be elligible for selling?
>>
>> I'm not a specialist on the Gnu licences, but
> "Han-Wen" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Han-Wen> However, I'm not a commercial publisher, so I can't
Han-Wen> really judge if the output is `good enough' by publishing
Han-Wen> standards to do so.
I'm not a commercial publisher either, but people do occasional
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >mercial distribution. What I mean is, can something that
> >has been typesetted with Lilypond and layed out with
> >LaTeX be elligible for selling?
>
> I'm not a specialist on the Gnu licences, but as far as
> I can understand, there's nothing that p
Found this old question in my mailbox.
> Hi,
>
>
>I was wondering about two topics...
>
>The first one : is Lilypond (and LaTeX) viable for com-
>mercial distribution. What I mean is, can something that
>has been typesetted with Lilypond and layed out with
>LaTeX be
Hi,
I was wondering about two topics...
The first one : is Lilypond (and LaTeX) viable for com-
mercial distribution. What I mean is, can something that
has been typesetted with Lilypond and layed out with
LaTeX be elligible for selling?
The second one : is there
