Stefan Thomas a écrit :
Dear John,
I tried now Your key-diatonic tranposition, but, in the below quoted
snippet, it doesn't work. I get the error message:
programming error: moving backwards in time
Hello Stefan,
I can reproduce this error and I get strange output (staves with only the
staff
Dear John,
I tried now Your key-diatonic tranposition, but, in the below quoted
snippet, it doesn't work. I get the error message:
programming error: moving backwards in time
Here is the snippet:
%% begin %%
%
\version "2.12.0"
\include "intervalle.ly"
oberstim
On 30 Dec 2008, at 03:08, Graham Breed wrote:
Right, that's how it looked to me. If it doesn't assume equal
temperament it should work generally. But I haven't tested it.
Note that I discovered it is possible to get more than 7 scale steps
to the octave (see the development list). So this wo
2008/12/29 John Mandereau :
> This work is not synced at all with Graham's work, but it tries not to
> naively assume any temperament; in current state it only works with
> 7-notes scales, but the arithmetics on alteration works with any kind
> alteration, semi-tones or microtonal alterations.
Ri
/examples/transpose.ly:18:5: Wrong type: (unquote SHARP)
Nick
> -Original Message-
> Behalf Of John Mandereau
> Sent: Tuesday, 30 December 2008 07:55
> To: Stefan Thomas
> Cc: lilypond-user
> Subject: Re: Diatonic/modal transposition function (John Mandereau)
>
> Le lundi
Le lundi 29 décembre 2008 à 12:33 +0100, Tao Cumplido a écrit :
> As far as I understand it it works independent from a key signature so
> it doesn't matter if the key is in C or not.
>
> The function says taht you transpose a pattern in a given key for X
> steps, so in your example you transpose a
Le lundi 29 décembre 2008 à 10:16 +0100, Stefan Thomas a écrit :
> Dear John,
> I understood now. You have a note 0 in c major and in a minor, which
> is a c.
The most meaningful I think is that c major and a minor define the same
major scale in LilyPond, only the tonic (c or a, respectively) diff
Le lundi 29 décembre 2008 à 15:44 +0100, Hans Aberg a écrit :
> Is this synced with the work by Graham Breed, who has worked on
> microtonal extensions? - See the developers list.
I assume you refer to "Mictrotonal support" thread, which is kind-of a
follow-up of "Diatonic notation system" (traf
On 29 Dec 2008, at 00:56, John Mandereau wrote:
I finally managed to write, debug, clean up and document diatonic
transposition functions. Here is the full code with some examples
below. There are two end-user functions, the generic modeTranspose
and
a shortcut diatonicTranspose.
Is this
:29 +0100
> Von: "Stefan Thomas"
> An: lilypond-user , john.mander...@gmail.com
> Betreff: Re: Diatonic/modal transposition function (John Mandereau)
> Dear John,
> I understood now. You have a note 0 in c major and in a minor, which
> is a c. In my opinion it wo
Dear John,
I understood now. You have a note 0 in c major and in a minor, which
is a c. In my opinion it would be better to understand for a musician,
if You could use the intervall-names. I suggest something like:
diatonicfourthup= #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?)
#{
$x \d
Dear John,
many thanks for Your fantastic macro! There is only one thing, I don't
understand. I tried to transpose to a minor. Why does it, in the below
quoted example, start with d? The first note should be a, I assume.
pattern = \relative c' { c2~ c8 d16 e f g a b c4 g e c }
\new Staff {
\pat
John Mandereau wrote:
Hello,
This email is a follow-up to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-12/msg00591.html
I started a new thread because I'm finally not sure whether the code
below answers the initial question.
I finally managed to write, debug, clean up and document diaton
Hello,
This email is a follow-up to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-12/msg00591.html
I started a new thread because I'm finally not sure whether the code
below answers the initial question.
I finally managed to write, debug, clean up and document diatonic
transposition functio
14 matches
Mail list logo
