Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread Gerard McConnell
Your second example shows the correct beaming as required in Associated Board theory exams. On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Nick Payne wrote: > According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond > default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following example; it sho

Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread David Kastrup
Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > Am Freitag, 26. August 2011, 15:12:16 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Note that this would not agree with Gould. Paraphrasing the gut rule I >> apply here, this would likely be something like >> >> An off-beat can be beamed to the next group if its on-beat is not >> e

Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread Hans Aberg
On 26 Aug 2011, at 15:14, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 26 Aug 2011, at 13:07, Nick Payne wrote: > >> According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond >> default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following example; it should be >> beamed as in the sec

Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Freitag, 26. August 2011, 15:12:16 schrieb David Kastrup: > Note that this would not agree with Gould. Paraphrasing the gut rule I > apply here, this would likely be something like > > An off-beat can be beamed to the next group if its on-beat is not > explicitly present. The problem is t

Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread Hans Aberg
On 26 Aug 2011, at 13:07, Nick Payne wrote: > According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond > default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following example; it should be > beamed as in the second bar: > > \version "2.14.2" > > \relative

Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 1:23 PM > Subject: Re: Default beaming for 3/4 > > >> Nick Payne writes: >> >>> According to Gould (p.153, about h

Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 1:23 PM Subject: Re: Default beaming for 3/4 Nick Payne writes: According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following e

Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread David Kastrup
Nick Payne writes: > According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond > default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following example; it > should be beamed as in the second bar: > > \version "2.14.2" > > \relative c' { > \time

Re: Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Nick Payne" To: Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 12:07 PM Subject: Default beaming for 3/4 According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following example; it should be beamed

Default beaming for 3/4

2011-08-26 Thread Nick Payne
According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following example; it should be beamed as in the second bar: \version "2.14.2" \relative c' { \time 3/4 c4. c8 c c