Pedro Kroger wrote:
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Again, Feri's deb installs a working version,
Could you try the new version in my website? (2.1.9-2)
Up and running! Thanks. What did you change?
Paul
___
Lilypond-user mailing li
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Could you try the new version in my website? (2.1.9-2)
> >
> Up and running! Thanks. What did you change?
guess what, pentium optimizations, like Jan suggested!
Pedro
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> lilypond-bin was not complied using special pentium-foo gcc
> optimisations, I hope?
err it was! I had optimisation flags in my .bashrc and forgot
about them. Needless to say, compiling lily without the pentium
optimisation flags solved the pro
Paul Scott writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/music/pima$ lilypond-bin --version
> Illegal instruction
You should check the md5sum of your lilypond-bins. lilypond-bin was
not complied using special pentium-foo gcc optimisations, I hope?
If that does not help, try reinstalling all library packages th
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Again, Feri's deb installs a working version,
Could you try the new version in my website? (2.1.9-2)
Pedro
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Pedro Kroger wrote:
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Pedro Kroger wrote:
that's weird. This "illegal instruction" seems to be from your system,
not from lilypond-bin. Here I have:
[18:39:01] ptolemy kroger $ lilypond-bin --fake
lilypond-bin: unrecognized option: `--fake'
how about:
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Pedro Kroger wrote:
>
> >* Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>then probably the command `/usr/bin/lilypond-bin --version ' did fail, so
> >>you could get a clue from running that command manually (so you would see
> >>stdout and stderr
Pedro Kroger wrote:
* Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
then probably the command `/usr/bin/lilypond-bin --version ' did fail, so you
could get a clue from running that command manually (so you would see stdout
and stderr). Note that it's lilypond-bin, not lilypond.
that's a good
Erik Sandberg wrote:
Now I'm guessing, but by manually running
/usr/bin/lilypond-bin --version
you might get a more detailed message about why it fails.
What I did was -V for verbose. --version is the same as -v which only
prints the version number.
I was maybe a bit unclear, what I m
* Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> then probably the command `/usr/bin/lilypond-bin --version ' did fail, so you
> could get a clue from running that command manually (so you would see stdout
> and stderr). Note that it's lilypond-bin, not lilypond.
that's a good idea, plus, could you
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17.05, Paul Scott wrote:
Pedro Kroger wrote:
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
To be truly honest, I haven't updated the packages dependencies
requirements. I'm going to do it ASAP, maybe that will help.
Thanks. Let
> >Now I'm guessing, but by manually running
> >/usr/bin/lilypond-bin --version
> >you might get a more detailed message about why it fails.
>
> What I did was -V for verbose. --version is the same as -v which only
> prints the version number.
I was maybe a bit unclear, what I meant was that sin
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17.05, Paul Scott wrote:
> Pedro Kroger wrote:
> >* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>>To be truly honest, I haven't updated the packages dependencies
> >>>requirements. I'm going to do it ASAP, maybe that will help.
> >>
> >>Thanks. Lets see what happens.
> >
Pedro Kroger wrote:
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
To be truly honest, I haven't updated the packages dependencies
requirements. I'm going to do it ASAP, maybe that will help.
Thanks. Lets see what happens.
Could you update to 2.1.9 and see if that works?
No change. Can
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >To be truly honest, I haven't updated the packages dependencies
> >requirements. I'm going to do it ASAP, maybe that will help.
> >
> Thanks. Lets see what happens.
Could you update to 2.1.9 and see if that works?
Pedro
___
Pedro Kroger wrote:
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
My system is now strictly unstable.
I almost forgot, which version of python are you running?
python -V
Python 2.3.3
Thanks,
Paul
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My system is now strictly unstable.
>
> I was wrong. This is not an emacs problem.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/music/pima$ lilypond -V dy1r1.ly
> lilypond (GNU LilyPond) 2.1.8
> Opening pipe `/usr/bin/lilypond-bin --version 'lilypond: error:
> `/usr/bin/lil
Pedro Kroger wrote:
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I certainly appreciate your effort here but your packages always break
my emacs setup and Ferenc's always work correctly. This is what emacs says:
cd /home/paul/music/pima/
lilypond /home/paul/music/pima/dy1r1.l
Pedro Kroger wrote:
Hi all,
Debian Sid packages (binary and sources) of Lilypond 2.1.8 are
available from my website:
Hi Pedro.
I certainly appreciate your effort here but your packages always break
my emacs setup and Ferenc's always work correctly. This is what emacs says:
---
* Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I certainly appreciate your effort here but your packages always break
> my emacs setup and Ferenc's always work correctly. This is what emacs says:
>
>
> cd /home/paul/music/pima/
> lilypond /home/paul/music/pima/dy1r1.ly
> lilypond
Hi all,
Debian Sid packages (binary and sources) of Lilypond 2.1.8 are
available from my website:
http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/
They're also apt-gettable adding the following line to sources.list:
deb http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/ ./
deb-src http://www.pedrokroeger.net/lilypond/
21 matches
Mail list logo
