Re: ChordNames default font

2013-01-09 Thread David Kastrup
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > Hi, > > I find the default choice of font and fontsize for ChordNames > extremely ugly. I know, it's a matter of personal taste. No, it isn't. Fonts are designed for purposes. The purpose of a running text font is to group into words as visual subunits of the larger

Re: ChordNames default font

2013-01-09 Thread Eluze
this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ChordNames-default-font-tp138957p139119.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

ChordNames default font

2013-01-07 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
Hi, I find the default choice of font and fontsize for ChordNames extremely ugly. I know, it's a matter of personal taste. But has there ever been a poll/vote among Lilypond users about this? I have a feeling that I am not the only one who *always* uses \override to change this ChordName fon