Hi all,
>> you might be true in this special case, but I (in my personal view)
>> consider this to be inconsistent. And that is why:
>> Csus2 =
>> Cadd9 =
>> Csus4 =
>> Cadd11 =
> I think you misread Kieren's comment.
> He was suggesting add2 as a clearer alternative to add9.
> Not sus2, but
Hi,
Am , schrieb Johan Vromans:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:33:52 +0100
Jan Kohnert wrote:
Version 2 whould probably be read more quickly and correct by Jazz
musicians, version 1 is more "correct" for a non-expert,
I doubt this. Even a non-expert needs to know a few basic things. E.g.,
C is
a
Dear Elaine,
> In terms of the latter musical context, the add9 is ambiguous, since it
> leaves open the question of whether the chord functions as a dominant or
> not. Yes, we all understand that when you write add9 you don't want to
> hear a 7th. But that does not mean that in the tonal musica
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 01:33:52 +0100
Jan Kohnert wrote:
> Version 2 whould probably be read more quickly and correct by Jazz
> musicians, version 1 is more "correct" for a non-expert,
I doubt this. Even a non-expert needs to know a few basic things. E.g., C is
a major triad. Cm is minor triad. 7
> From: Jan Kohnert
> To: Lilypond-User Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Chord names broken since 2.16
>
> Am , schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >> add9 is different from sus2, as add11 is different from sus4
> >
> > Really? In the musica
Hi,
(all examples in C major for reading purposes, and German notation, so
h(German)=b(English), and b(German)=(b-flat(English))
Am , schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi all,
add9 is different from sus2, as add11 is different from sus4
Really? In the musical theatre world, "add9” rarely (if ever
Hi all,
> add9 is different from sus2, as add11 is different from sus4
Really? In the musical theatre world, "add9” rarely (if ever) appears; the
preferred notation is “add2” (which, as a side benefit, makes sight reading
things like “C9” even faster and less error-prone).
> Nothing I ever saw
Am , schrieb Thomas Morley:
2015-03-15 14:19 GMT+01:00 Amelie Zapf :
Though, I can easily imagine situations where is
dominant or
subdominant or tonic, depends on the surrounding circumstances.
True. But the reverse doesn't hold.
So far, I'd agree
Again, I disagree here. Correct ChordNa
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:39:23 +0100
Thomas Morley wrote:
> And that's the reason why 'additionalPitchPrefix' was changed.
Sounds fair.
But the bottom line is that two different ordinary chords and
are both named "C9" and hence loose the distinction.
c:7.9 and c:5.9 are much more common than c
Hello,
Am , schrieb Amelie Zapf:
problem solved: \set Score.additionalPitchPrefix = "add" does the
trick.
However, this should be default behavior, because C9 and Cadd9 are just
not the same thing, but describe chords with vastly different harmonic
function.
seems we all stumble about that on
Hi again,
please always reply to all ;)
2015-03-15 14:19 GMT+01:00 Amelie Zapf :
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > Though, I can easily imagine situations where is dominant or
> > subdominant or tonic, depends on the surrounding circumstances.
>
> True. But the reverse doesn't hold.
>
So far, I'd agree
>
>
Hi Amelie,
2015-03-15 10:57 GMT+01:00 Amelie Zapf :
> Dear lilypond-user team,
>
> starting with LilyPond 2.16, and on into 2.18, the chord naming
> algorithm does not distinguish between a chord and d'> in relative notation. Both are named "C9".
Yep.
The 'additionalPitchPrefix' was changed to
Dear lilypond-user team,
problem solved: \set Score.additionalPitchPrefix = "add" does the trick.
However, this should be default behavior, because C9 and Cadd9 are just
not the same thing, but describe chords with vastly different harmonic
function.
Regards,
Amy
--
Dr. Amelie Zapf (a...@ame
Dear lilypond-user team,
starting with LilyPond 2.16, and on into 2.18, the chord naming
algorithm does not distinguish between a chord and in relative notation. Both are named "C9". This is wrong, since
functionally, the former is a dominant, the latter a tonic, so there
must be a distinction b
14 matches
Mail list logo
