On 3/8/2018 5:06 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hi Jacques,
I don’t know what’s special about it, but I can’t see the code example
you gave below without clicking ‘View source’ in Thunderbird. It’s
very welcome to send e-mail to this kind of lists as the most simple
form of plain text, so everybod
On 8 March 2018 at 20:20, Jacques Peron wrote:
> That said, with the following code, you get the number of the (already
> begun) measure between parentheses:
>
> {
> \set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible
> a b c d
> e f g \bar "" \break
> d
> e f g a \break b
> }
>
>
>
Wow.
Hi Jacques,
I don’t know what’s special about it, but I can’t see the code example
you gave below without clicking ‘View source’ in Thunderbird. It’s very
welcome to send e-mail to this kind of lists as the most simple form of
plain text, so everybody gets to partake equally. (Though I have to
That said, with the following code, you get the number of the (already
begun) measure between parentheses:
{
\set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible
a b c d
e f g \bar "" \break
d
e f g a \break b
}
2018-03-08 20:16 GMT+01:00 Jacques Peron :
> I think it’s normal that the ba
I think it’s normal that the bar number disappears, as the break occurs at
the middle of the measure. If you want each part of the measure to be
counted as a measure, you could do something like that:
{
a b c d
\set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 3 4) e f g \break
\set Timing.measureLengt
Thank you Jacques, Kieren and Torsten, \bar "" and \break do what I need
(I was already using them but didn't know that I could avoid \partial!!!).
But I have seen that when I use \bar "" and \break the bar number at
beginning of the new line disappear. Do I need to change the \override
Score.Ba
Ciao Gianmaria,
I'm not quite sure if I've got you right, but you can break a measure
anywhere if you insert an (invisible) barline. After \bar "" you can insert
\break commands wherever you want.
HTH,
Torsten
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
__
Hi Gianmaria,
> Normally a measure is not broken and split on two different lines. But in
> case I want to do it, is there any way to accomplish it without using
> \partial ?
\bar "" \break
Of course, if there’s something unbreakable at that point (e.g., a beam), you
may have to do a little e
This should be achieved with \bar "":
{a b c \bar "" \break d}
2018-03-08 17:27 GMT+01:00 Gianmaria Lari :
> Normally a measure is not broken and split on two different lines. But in
> case I want to do it, is there any way to accomplish it without using
> \partial ?
>
>
>
> Gianmaria Lari
Normally a measure is not broken and split on two different lines. But in case
I want to do it, is there any way to accomplish it without using \partial ?
[Gianmaria Lari - Contact Using Hop](http://GetHop.com/?_hmid=1520526444)___
lilypond-user mailing
10 matches
Mail list logo
