Hello all,
A large proportion of my compositions and arrangements include voice. There are
certain (one might almost say “many”) things about Lily’s vocal engraving
engine that need fixing. Hence I was very excited when Janek took that part of
Lily on during his Google Summer of Code stint. How
Marc Hohl writes:
> Ok, let's take the guitar string bend stuff as an example: I think
> that Lilypond would benefit *a lot* if this feature were implemented.
> Tuxguitar can export .ly files, but without the bend stuff.
>
> A skilled programmer should be able to implement this for, say, 300$.
>
precede the addition
> of feature X. Bounties could end up complicating the logical
> development of Lilypond if they end up causing piecemeal development.
There certainly is a case for bounties as well. Bounties _tend_ to be
raller on the smallish side compared with actual development ef
Tim McNamara writes:
> It is quite possible that the Lilypond team doesn't want to have to
> set up accounting and disbursement mechanisms, however. There are
> some headaches and legalities that would be involved which might be
> more trouble than they are worth.
That is the current problem.
t want feature X, but groundwork U V and W- about which I
>> know nothing- would have to precede the addition of feature X. Bounties
>> could end up complicating the logical development of Lilypond if they end up
>> causing piecemeal development.
> +1
>
> I think that
Am 25.01.2012 11:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
[...]
I don't know about legal and organizational issues, but what about a
optional lilypond usage fee?
"fee" has a bad ring to it.
Ok, this was not the appropriate word - replace it with whatever you
think is reasonable.
We are
> and W- about which I know nothing- would have to precede the addition
> of feature X. Bounties could end up complicating the logical
> development of Lilypond if they end up causing piecemeal development.
> +1
>
> I think that the bounty model for special features won't work
&
ly.
Saul
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Bounties-%28was%3A-User-vs-Developer%29-tp33197679p33199937.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu
have to precede the addition of feature X. Bounties could
end up complicating the logical development of Lilypond if they end up causing
piecemeal development.
+1
I think that the bounty model for special features won't work (yet). The
bounites drop in from time to
time, and it is not cl
. Bounties could
end up complicating the logical development of Lilypond if they end up causing
piecemeal development.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Janek Warchoł writes:
> I think that bounties will never have significant impact on Lily
> development if we don't organize them. It's because writing code is
> very expensive ($200-500 for a nontrivial patch?) compared to money
> average user can spend (few can afford
I think that bounties will never have significant impact on Lily
development if we don't organize them. It's because writing code is
very expensive ($200-500 for a nontrivial patch?) compared to money
average user can spend (few can afford $100 i think).
I am serious: there are at least
The donation idea is pretty good. That't pretty ok with GNU philosophy BTW.
Think of the Free Software Foundation. Ardour has a way of doing this, it
has one main developers and it seems that who contribute more to the project
have more priority in the suggestion of requested features. Of course
c
On 06/17/2010 03:35 PM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> The main obstacle, of course, being the international essence of the
> project, whereas non-profit organisations, bank accounts, etc. are
> usually conceived in a nation-centric perspective.
What are the particular problems there? Is it just thi
Op donderdag 17-06-2010 om 15:35 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Valentin
Villenave:
> As I mentioned in the other thread, there are plans to build such an
> organization in France, from scratch (another possibility would be to
> revive the (Netherlands-based?) LilyPond foundation, but we'd need
> m
2010/6/17 Valentin Villenave :
> Absolutely. That's why I've always said that we should have something
> like a "bounty thermometer" (such as the one they use for Blender's
> open movies IIRC, or http://haikuware.com/bounties/ as well).
Agree.
At this tim
so +1
The question is : how is it used, what for, and by who ? It may sound an
odd question, but I can assure you that in France, such questions of
transparency ARE NOT that obvious. I think each list shouild have its
contributors ?
Cheers
JM
Marek Klein a écrit :
2010/6/17 Christ van Wil
2010/6/17 Christ van Willegen
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Stocker
> wrote:
> > I think
> > LilyPond has a dedicated base of users who would be glad to contribute
> > resources in a concrete and structured way. It might be worth
> considering.
>
> I agree. Paying a 'subscription' for
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Stocker
wrote:
> I think
> LilyPond has a dedicated base of users who would be glad to contribute
> resources in a concrete and structured way. It might be worth considering.
I agree. Paying a 'subscription' for Lilypond usage would suit me just fine.
Chris
If you haven't already, have a look at Ardour's subscription page
http://ardour.org/why_subscribe
This may be a viable answer. At one time, I was a subscriber,
contributing $4.00US per month via automated paypal withdrawl. $4.00/mo
is pretty painless when you lump it in with your other busines
Hi.
I thought one could order "pieces of improvment" (it's been a long time
since I read something on it...). The idea is : I pay for my personnel
need, and the improvment is put back in the community. This question
strikes me because I've just beginning to set up shop as an editor, and
I've
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> (I wouldn't surely be the ideal person for founding a lilypond
> users group), I am willing to spend a fee, say $50 a year, for
> supporting the lilypond development. If there are 99 people more
> (and I think there are a lot more!), we would hav
27PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
[...]
> I am considering to offer commercial support and may be able to do
> that on a part-time basis. However, working on two bounties has
> illustrated that bounty work can be quite tricky.
Indeed; there's almost no relationship between the amo
om: Graham Percival
Subject: bounties
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org, LilyPond Development
Message-ID: <20100615191934.gb10...@sapphire>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:25:27PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 15-0
7;t enough people offering
> > bounties
>
> I am considering to offer commercial support and may be able to do
> that on a part-time basis. However, working on two bounties has
> illustrated that bounty work can be quite tricky.
Indeed; there's almost no relationship betw
Something like the Gnome bounties system perhaps? See -
http://www.gnome.org/bounties/index.html for details.
Jamie
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:02 +0200, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Thursday 30 June 2005 13.14, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > If you're willing to pay for the develo
26 matches
Mail list logo
