Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
Ok, since I am not apparently getting _any_ answers but just unrelated buzzphrases pasted to the top of the quoted communication time and again, I will briefly point out first how we communicate on this list. One quotes the _pertinent_ part of the documentation first, then adds one's answers usual

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
I wrote the Blended system to fit all of the requirements for redesigning the website (not documentation) for LilyPond. A nice side effect was that I can use it for other things. On Feb 4, 2017 5:59 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > John Roper writes: > > >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David Kas

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
John Roper writes: >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> John Roper writes: >>> >>> >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Urs Liska writes: >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Separating website content from general documentation should >>> >>> > defi

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 04.02.2017 um 22:16 schrieb David Kastrup: >>> Separating website content from general documentation should definitely >>> be an option. >> What advantages do you expect from it? > > Breaking the technical tie between documentation and website makes it > possible to update

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread Urs Liska
Am 04.02.2017 um 22:16 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Separating website content from general documentation should definitely >> be an option. > What advantages do you expect from it? Breaking the technical tie between documentation and website makes it possible to update the (much smaller) website ind

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
Design update. It looks better and attracts more users to the software. On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > John Roper writes: > > >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >>> Urs Liska writes: > >>> > >>> > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Brun

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
John Roper writes: >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> Urs Liska writes: >>> >>> > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: >>> >> Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper >>> >> ha scritto: >>> >>> OK, I was asking because I have written a static comman

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread Simon Albrecht
A: Because it messes with the order in which people read text. Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing? Just sayin’… :-) Best, Simon On 04.02.2017 22:21, John Roper wrote: It is easier for users to write and it looks better. Blended exports human-readable files. Look at the website. http://jmroper.

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
It is easier for users to write and it looks better. Blended exports human-readable files. Look at the website. http://jmroper.com/blended/ On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Urs Liska writes: > > > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: > >> Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: >> Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper >> ha scritto: >>> OK, I was asking because I have written a static command line HTML >>> site generator that builds from HTML, Markdown, reStruturedText, >>> Textile, Plain Text

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-04 Thread John Roper
Blended now has support for *eleven* markup languages and it has a new website! http://jmroper.com/blended/ On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:39 PM, John Roper wrote: > There is a template system. You setup page templates and Blended inserts > the text from any file into that template. > > On Fri, Feb 3

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-03 Thread John Roper
There is a template system. You setup page templates and Blended inserts the text from any file into that template. On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper > > ha scritto: > >> OK,

Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-03 Thread Urs Liska
Am 03.02.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Federico Bruni: > Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper > ha scritto: >> OK, I was asking because I have written a static command line HTML >> site generator that builds from HTML, Markdown, reStruturedText, >> Textile, Plain Text (.txt), and Microsoft Wo

Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website]

2017-02-03 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno ven 3 feb 2017 alle 11:31, John Roper ha scritto: OK, I was asking because I have written a static command line HTML site generator that builds from HTML, Markdown, reStruturedText, Textile, Plain Text (.txt), and Microsoft Word (.docx). http://jmroper.com/blended Is that versatile e