Re: vertical position of beamed rests

2014-03-18 Thread Michael Winter
e score out into the world! Best, Mike On 03/10/2014 01:14 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:54:36 -0700 > From: casey anderson > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: vertical position of beamed rests > Message-ID: > > Content-Typ

Re: vertical position of beamed rests

2014-03-10 Thread casey anderson
Hi all, We ended up refactoring all the rest such that they are give with an explicit note value followed by \rest. However, that did not solve the problem. Is there any other potential solution? e.g. forcing the starts and ends of a beam to be of at least a certain height if stems up and belo

Re: vertical position of beamed rests

2014-02-08 Thread Casey Anderson
hi urs, sure, but refactoring all the rests would be very difficult as the score is already completely generated...we are hoping to simply make this change when necessary on a case-by-case basis. any idea how to do so without refactoring the entire score (there are 64 of them)? casey On Sat, Fe

Re: vertical position of beamed rests

2014-02-08 Thread Urs Liska
Casey Anderson schrieb: >hi all, > >we are beaming over rests with stemlets, which often pushes the rest up >or >down, but would like to keep the rest vertically centered in the staff. >when we try: > >\override Score.Rest #'staff-position = #'-0 > >the rests get positioned correctly, but the be

vertical position of beamed rests

2014-02-08 Thread Casey Anderson
hi all, we are beaming over rests with stemlets, which often pushes the rest up or down, but would like to keep the rest vertically centered in the staff. when we try: \override Score.Rest #'staff-position = #'-0 the rests get positioned correctly, but the beam does not change accordingly to pre

Re: Beamed rests

2012-04-04 Thread Nick Payne
On 05/04/12 12:14, Dossy Shiobara wrote: \version "2.14.2" \score { \new Staff { \clef "bass" \relative c << { \voiceThree s16 s32 fis16\rest s } \\ { \voiceFour a16[ \once \override Rest #'transparent = ##t r8 a16] } >> } } This is simpler: \version "2.15.3

Re: Beamed rests

2012-04-04 Thread Dossy Shiobara
How's this: \version "2.14.2" \score {   \new Staff {     \clef "bass"     \relative c <<   { \voiceThree s16 s32 fis16\rest s } \\   { \voiceFour a16[   \once \override Rest #'transparent = ##t r8   a16] }     >>   }

Re: Beamed rests

2012-04-04 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Fulvio Turra wrote: > Hello all. I am a new Lilypond user and I'm in trouble trying to reproduce > a beam over a 16th rest, between two 16th notes, as in the followin picture: > [image: Immagine in linea 1] > Hmm. This notation looks wrong to me; i'd expect eithe

Beamed rests

2012-04-04 Thread Fulvio Turra
Hello all. I am a new Lilypond user and I'm in trouble trying to reproduce a beam over a 16th rest, between two 16th notes, as in the followin picture: [image: Immagine in linea 1] The only acceptable solution I've found so far is to apply *\set stemLeftBeamCount = #1 *to the rest, but the result

beamed rests

2003-06-11 Thread David Bobroff
It seems that beaming to rests doesn't work with a single note and a rest. If I try, I get this: warning: beam has less than two visible stems: This illustrates what I'm talking about. If the beaming brackets are removed there is no error. Is it possible to get Lily to do this? -David Bobro