> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 11:54, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
>
> Thus I think this would be a sensible default. Is there any good reason
> against using this by default?
I wondered about that as well when I split the barNumberVisibility test and
submitted the pending MR to no longer require \bar
Hello Jean,
in my opinion even if Gould did not specify this it is the most obvious
solution to this, that is, the one solution everyone would come up with
immediately.
Thus I think this would be a sensible default. Is there any good reason against
using this by default?
Best,
Valentin
06.02
On 2022-02-06 1:37 am, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Are you aware of the options to print a parenthesized bar number at
the start of the line if it's the continuation of a measure? See
input/regression/bar-number-visibility-* (sadly missing documentation
at the moment). I don't have an opinion on wheth
> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 10:16, Aaron Hill a écrit :
>
> I have for quite some time just relied on the default behavior where bar
> numbers are printed only for the first measure in each line (save the very
> first measure). This works reasonably well as my musicians are able to
> locate measure
I have for quite some time just relied on the default behavior where bar
numbers are printed only for the first measure in each line (save the
very first measure). This works reasonably well as my musicians are
able to locate measures by number fairly quickly. However, there is an
issue when
