pares writing \bar "" if you really want a break in the
> middle of a measure. Of course, if it's unintendedly in the middle
> of a measure, the output will look silly, but it should be easier to
> find where the mistake occurred in the code thanks to point-and-click
> (ba
ere the mistake occurred in the code thanks to point-and-click
(bar checks obviously help a lot too). Another advantage is
that \break will just bypass beams and other such unbreakable spanners
without requiring extra overrides.
Best,
Jean
a Chopin
> > Waltz.
> >
> > The problem goes away when I disabled the forced line breaks, so I
> > do think that there is a problem here, although it is an annoyance,
> > not severe.
> >
> > There is no problem with the bar checks after I disable the forc
gt; alternative.
>
> This particular example is a simplified version/arrangement of a Chopin
> Waltz.
>
> The problem goes away when I disabled the forced line breaks, so I
> do think that there is a problem here, although it is an annoyance,
> not severe.
>
> There
> >This particular example is a simplified version/arrangement of a Chopin
> > Waltz.
> >
> >The problem goes away when I disabled the forced line breaks, so I
> > do think that there is a problem here, although it is an annoyance,
> > not severe.
>
problem goes away when I disabled the forced line breaks, so I
do think that there is a problem here, although it is an annoyance,
not severe.
There is no problem with the bar checks after I disable the forced
line breaks.
While bar checks are one frequent cause of inability
to honor a break
breaks, so I
do think that there is a problem here, although it is an annoyance,
not severe.
There is no problem with the bar checks after I disable the forced
line breaks.
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:32 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/12/22, 3:24 PM, "lilypond-
ic 0 times.
Thanks again,
Ken
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:20 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> Is there a bug in the Lilypond parser regarding bar checks?
>
This isn't a parsing problem, it's an interpretation problem It shows up
Yes, disabling line breaks removes the warning. BTW, repeat volta 0
is in use; is that relevant?
Thanks again,
Ken
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:20 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> Is there a bug in the Lilypond parser regarding bar checks?
>
> It would be nice if Lil
Hi;
Is there a bug in the Lilypond parser regarding bar checks?
It would be nice if Lilypond would let me know more specifically
where this warning occurred, shouldn't it know?
I don't see the error in my engraving that would cause this and I'm
having trouble using th
On 06/07/2019 15:02, Leah Velleman wrote:
Is there a way to turn off bar checks? Or to write a music function
that strips out bar checks?
Or does anyone have suggestions on where to start looking for such
things?
You can redefine the | symbol to do nothing like this.
\version "2.
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 10:05 AM Leah Velleman
wrote:
> Is there a way to turn off bar checks? Or to write a music function that
> strips out bar checks?
>
> Or does anyone have suggestions on where to start looking for such things?
>
> Here's the situation. Most of what
Is there a way to turn off bar checks? Or to write a music function that
strips out bar checks?
Or does anyone have suggestions on where to start looking for such things?
Here's the situation. Most of what I write (largely Sacred Harp fuguing
tunes) triggers a known limitation around bar c
gt; list as defined.
>
> The same would be true of speech. Yes, you can notate the stresses of
> poetry, but you can't notate the durations of the actual syllables.
> (Well, you *could* notate the syllables using the conventions of
> music, but a literal interpretation of the sco
ame would be true of speech. Yes, you can notate the stresses of
poetry, but you can't notate the durations of the actual syllables.
(Well, you *could* notate the syllables using the conventions of
music, but a literal interpretation of the score would not sound
anything like natural speech.)
>
midi compiles properly, the
music in the pdf runs off the page.
Lilypond says that the bar checks in the top voice are failing. I
suspect that this is the root of the problem. I've run versions of
the code with each of the two voices commented out. When the voices
play separately, th
From: Michael Collins
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:57 PM
Subject: bar checks and independent time signatures
Hello,
A couple days ago, I described a problem with a piece for two staves in
independent time signatures. After consulting this post, I move
ontext. While the midi compiles properly, the music in the pdf runs
off the page.
Lilypond says that the bar checks in the top voice are failing. I suspect
that this is the root of the problem. I've run versions of the code with
each of the two voices commented out. When the voices play sepa
Noeck writes:
> Hi,
>
> this is a question of ly code style:
> Would you recommend putting the bar check always after the note or in
> some circumstances also after an including brace?
>
> Background: In many cases it is wrong to put a bar check outside braces
> because it is then outside the mus
Noeck gmx.de> writes:
> Would you recommend putting the bar check always after the note or in
> some circumstances also after an including brace?
> \alternative {
> { a2 b } | % wrong
> { a2 a } | % wrong
> }
If there is more than one measure in each alternative sequence,
then th
Hi,
this is a question of ly code style:
Would you recommend putting the bar check always after the note or in
some circumstances also after an including brace?
Background: In many cases it is wrong to put a bar check outside braces
because it is then outside the music expression and appears as i
Colin Tennyson wrote
> Following up on my previous post:
>
> Is it good practice to put bar checks inside \lyricsmode { ... } ?
> Dormend__a_minor.ly
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n156747/Dormend__a_minor.ly>
>
> In the source I inserted the pipe-s
Following up on my previous post:
Is it good practice to put bar checks inside \lyricsmode { ... } ?
Dormend__a_minor.ly
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n156747/Dormend__a_minor.ly>
In the source I inserted the pipe-symbol for bar check both in the note
entries and in the
Mike Solomon writes:
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 6:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>>> Mike Solomon writes:
>>>
hmm…for a slightly less minimal example, I'm trying to do:
bc = |
foo = { \bc \bar "|" }
{
a a a a a \foo
}
On Oct 14, 2013, at 6:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Mike Solomon writes:
>>
>>> hmm…for a slightly less minimal example, I'm trying to do:
>>>
>>> bc = |
>>>
>>> foo = { \bc \bar "|" }
>>>
>>> {
>>> a a a a a \foo
>>> }
>>>
>>> Any ideas on how to accomplish tha
David Kastrup writes:
> Mike Solomon writes:
>
>> hmm…for a slightly less minimal example, I'm trying to do:
>>
>> bc = |
>>
>> foo = { \bc \bar "|" }
>>
>> {
>> a a a a a \foo
>> }
>>
>> Any ideas on how to accomplish that?
>
> Simple. First fix
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/deta
Mike Solomon writes:
> hmm…for a slightly less minimal example, I'm trying to do:
>
> bc = |
>
> foo = { \bc \bar "|" }
>
> {
> a a a a a \foo
> }
>
> Any ideas on how to accomplish that?
Simple. First fix
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2392>
then revert
commit c83a3afbc5
On Oct 14, 2013, at 5:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Mike Solomon writes:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Is it possible to do something like this:
>>
>>
>> bc = { | }
>>
>> {
>> a a a a a \bc
>> }
>>
>>
>> And have the bar check kick in?
>
> Well, it is actually rather curious that it doesn't, but
Mike Solomon writes:
> Hey all,
>
> Is it possible to do something like this:
>
>
> bc = { | }
>
> {
> a a a a a \bc
> }
>
>
> And have the bar check kick in?
Well, it is actually rather curious that it doesn't, but that's not
related to the variable but rather the enclosing { ... }.
It turn
hi,
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Is it possible to do something like this:
>
>
> bc = { | }
untested, but may work:
bc = #(make-music 'BarCheck)
but why would you want to do such a thing? replacing a single
character with three seems a bit of an odd effi
Hey all,
Is it possible to do something like this:
bc = { | }
{
a a a a a \bc
}
And have the bar check kick in?
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
31 matches
Mail list logo
